Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2017-02-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
is interested to start >> contributing! >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Web-site-update-tp4720422p4721567.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2017-02-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
> contributing! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Web-site-update-tp4720422p4721567.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Clebert Suconic

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2017-02-03 Thread nigro_franz
+1 For renewed logo and front page, but sadly my artistic skills and aesthetic sense are very very very low :( But, I'll ask to a front-end developer friend if he is interested to start contributing! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Web-site-update

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2017-02-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
I gave up on doing it myself... I still want a face lift of the web site. But I have been doing some refactoring on Message encodings and protocols (making it faster) + the recent IO work I did.. so I"m not finding time to do it myself. But I'm asking anyone with good experience in Web Design to

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 12/15/2016 05:03 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: How we could revamp the webiste on activemq.apache.org. Both Camel and ActiveMQ share the same design. It would be great if we could do something clean... I like the example of qpid.apache.org, I would even still their design :).

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-23 Thread Hiram Chirino
If your looking to do a new custom template, you might want to try out something like https://webflow.com/ For a small price you get really nice visual way to control all the html/css you'd want to do and then export it so you can turn it into a template. On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Martyn

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-21 Thread Martyn Taylor
I can help with this. Let's sync up in the new yeat On 21 Dec 2016 16:15, "Clebert Suconic" wrote: > H.. I need a web designer's help.. anyone caring to help? or give > us some direction? > > > I was trying to do this by hand.. getting the index.html and make it >

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-21 Thread Clebert Suconic
H.. I need a web designer's help.. anyone caring to help? or give us some direction? I was trying to do this by hand.. getting the index.html and make it look like the artemis website (just for a prototype), and this harder than I thought. I will need some help... anyway.. this will be

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-16 Thread Robbie Gemmell
The content for most of the site is actually a Confluence wiki, which is converted into the HTML pages for the website, with those then being committed into an svn repo, and that being mirrored onto the webservers upon commit by an svnpubsub process. The 'source' for the website is mostly:

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-16 Thread Dejan Bosanac
I think the good starting point would be to create a new front page, that explains what’s this all about and have some links to subprojects, downloads, news, blogs and stuff. Then we can migrate existing sites to the new style one by one. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac http://sensatic.net/about On

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-16 Thread Bennet Schulz
+1 the websites of kafka, mesos and cassandra are nice. I would contribute as well. > Am 15.12.2016 um 20:08 schrieb Matt Pavlovich : > > @tbish.. haha. Yeah, the Karaf site can be a bit much, but the use of color > and pictures is good.. lot of other popular open source

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
I got a bit confused. There is a confluence link at the page. But there is a svn for the website. Confluence is the old scheme? What's going on? :) On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:41 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > @tbish Good point. We'll want to bring NMS, CMS, etc along for

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
@tbish Good point. We'll want to bring NMS, CMS, etc along for sure. On 12/15/16 2:21 PM, Timothy Bish wrote: On 12/15/2016 02:08 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: @tbish.. haha. Yeah, the Karaf site can be a bit much, but the use of color and pictures is good.. lot of other popular open source

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 12/15/2016 02:08 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: @tbish.. haha. Yeah, the Karaf site can be a bit much, but the use of color and pictures is good.. lot of other popular open source projects have similar layouts.. spring.io, etc. @clebert- IMO the plain apache.org is pretty bland. Prolly one

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
@tbish.. haha. Yeah, the Karaf site can be a bit much, but the use of color and pictures is good.. lot of other popular open source projects have similar layouts.. spring.io, etc. @clebert- IMO the plain apache.org is pretty bland. Prolly one step up from openbsd.org level blandness ;-) The

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 12/15/2016 12:11 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: >> >> +1 website needs to be updated and will to assist. >> >> I'd also throw out there kafka.apache.org and karaf.apache.org as design >> concepts to consider as well. >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 12/15/2016 12:11 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: +1 website needs to be updated and will to assist. I'd also throw out there kafka.apache.org and karaf.apache.org as design concepts to consider as well. The Kafka one isn't bad, the Karaf site make me feel like I need to contact someone from

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1, definitely time for a face lift but not sure what the best way to go about it is. It would be nice if it could be automated and generated from Markdown like the Artemis docs, or something like that. On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > +1. Also happy

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Martyn Taylor
+1. Also happy to provide support/help On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > +1 website needs to be updated and will to assist. > > I'd also throw out there kafka.apache.org and karaf.apache.org as design > concepts to consider as well. > > > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
+1 website needs to be updated and will to assist. I'd also throw out there kafka.apache.org and karaf.apache.org as design concepts to consider as well. On 12/15/16 11:03 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: How we could revamp the webiste on activemq.apache.org. Both Camel and ActiveMQ share the

[DISCUSS] Web site update

2016-12-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
How we could revamp the webiste on activemq.apache.org. Both Camel and ActiveMQ share the same design. It would be great if we could do something clean... I like the example of qpid.apache.org, I would even still their design :). Maybe bring Artemis a bit more up front on the website and make