Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
We do the same as if message group which doesnât increase the pos if
itâs exclusive just like it doesnât if exclusive.
We can enhance this if needed. Ping me on IR
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@michaelandrepearce I think the logic should have been updated on
QueueImpl for the exclusive consumer...
You should just had the pos always 0. or have a different log
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@michaelandrepearce i don't have the chance to merge it yet :(
Anyway it seems that there aren't any objections so I suppose it is ok ð
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@franz1981 seems no objections, you still ok to merge?
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@michaelandrepearce @gtully @mtaylor If everything is fine I will going to
merge it, ok?
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@gtully you happy if this is merged? Just waiting on this before I continue
with the other bits as mentioned
---
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@michaelandrepearce Hey Michael. I think this was a temp failure. There
is an Artemis PR job running now that doesn't show the git clone problem. The
CI is shared and there are a bunch
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@gtully yes there is a use case for the client part here in our org, thus
why. I'd rather do this fully, than partial.
@mtaylor or anyone with access, can someone look
Github user gtully commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@michaelandrepearce to make the feature work is trivial in queueimpl; to
make it dynamic is a lot of code.
I would have been shooting for an address setting and pulling that value in
qu
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1832
@gtully ping.
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
