[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread yersan
Github user yersan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 @jbertram Done, thanks! ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread jbertram
Github user jbertram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 Although this has been merged the PR won't be closed automatically (something funny going on in the automation). @yersan, please close this PR manually. ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread jbertram
Github user jbertram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 So forget what I said before. I'll merge this PR and then send a different one upstream to deal with this issue in a different way given the management objects have changed so

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread yersan
Github user yersan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 @jbertram Note that there is no JMSServerControlTest test on master branch, but it exists on 1.x. This test can be used to cover this issue against regression, how do you usually deal with

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread yersan
Github user yersan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 Ok, I'm going to close this one and create a new one for master and for 1.x (cherry-picked from master once it is merged) ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread jbertram
Github user jbertram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 Ideally there would be a new PR on master and then a cherry-pick of that same commit onto 1.x (which would preclude this PR from staying open). ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread yersan
Github user yersan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 @jbertram will it work for you if I create a new one PR on master branch and let this one open for 1.x? ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread jbertram
Github user jbertram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 If you don't want to do it let me know, and I'll do it. No worries. In any case, I think this PR should be closed. ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1854: [ARTEMIS-1666] List of prepared transaction de...

2018-02-12 Thread jbertram
Github user jbertram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1854 Typically issues like this would be fixed on the 'master' branch first and then back-ported to any other branches to avoid regressions. Although the JMSServerManager is deprecated on