Github user barreiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
Superseded by #872
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@barreiro can you close this one please, #872 will replace this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@barreiro I wil need a JIRA, can you raise one on Artemis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@barreiro just a FYI: I'm working on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user barreiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
Rebased
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
This will need a JIRA and a squash of the commit here as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
The failures on Paging is because the system currently doubles the size of
the buffer, because the address name is not encoded as part of every message,
while it is encoded during jo
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@barreiro sorry it took me this long to get into this.. but lets close
this one soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@barreiro did you think of using an executor from the ThreadPool?
(ExecutorFactory.createExecutor()) from ActiveMQServerImpl?
What about using the same executor for the bindi
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@mtaylor there's a test failure I need to take care before can merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@clebertsuconic Any update on this? Did you manage to complete the
comparison you wanted to do?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@clebertsuconic NP just checking we haven't forgot about this. Cheers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@mtaylor I want to compare this against #590. Especially on a test that is
being added.
Franceso proposed a garbage free approach on the journal that makes sense..
and I w
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
@clebertsuconic I think we can start looking at this now that we have 1.3.0
out the door. Are you able review? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
lets defer merging this until the release is done.
quite a big change now at the last minute.. better to wait next release.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
15 matches
Mail list logo
