Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0 release vote.
The vote passes with 10 Votes, 7 Bindings, 3 non Bindings
Binding Vote:
Clebert Suconic
Francesco Nigro
Timothy Bish
Justin Bertram
Christopher Shannon
Robbie Gemmel
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Non Binding:
Havret
Amit Aggrarwal
Domenico
Let me resend my vote too:
+1 (binding) :)
Il giorno lun 28 mar 2022 alle ore 10:38 Robbie Gemmell <
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Good question. Given it doesnt change that there are enough binding +1
> votes, it probably doesnt matter either way, but since we actually
> said they
Good question. Given it doesnt change that there are enough binding +1
votes, it probably doesnt matter either way, but since we actually
said they were non-binding its probably simpler to resend and make it
clear so there is no question later.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 23:37, Clebert
Lovely :)
Il dom 27 mar 2022, 17:32 Bruce Snyder ha scritto:
> Yes.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 17:37 Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > Can I count Robbie and Francesco votes as binding already ?
> >
> >
> > If I can’t. Can you recast them as binding please ?
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 26,
Yes.
Bruce
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 17:37 Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Can I count Robbie and Francesco votes as binding already ?
>
>
> If I can’t. Can you recast them as binding please ?
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I did few simple
Can I count Robbie and Francesco votes as binding already ?
If I can’t. Can you recast them as binding please ?
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I did few simple tests on this release:
> - build and run artemis
> - check hash and signatures
> -
+1 (binding)
I did few simple tests on this release:
- build and run artemis
- check hash and signatures
- check LICENSE and NOTICE files
- simple run on Karaf
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:32 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
+1 (non-binding)
I checked things over as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in the archives.
- Checked licence headers in the source archive by running:
"mvn apache-rat:check"
- Ran the Qpid JMS main HelloWorld against the broker from the
In order to continue discussing the issue you've raised here, Chris, I
think you should create a new thread on the dev list. I'd like to ask some
questions, but I don't feel it's appropriate on this thread (as you alluded
to).
Justin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:54 AM Christopher Shannon <
+1, built from source and ran some tests and it looks good. Not to hijack
the vote thread but it's relevant here because it caused me issues when
trying to review the release...
It would be nice if Jiras and commits messages actually contained useful
information. I've noticed a pattern in Artemis
+1!
Justin
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 4:39 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0 release.
>
> We added these new features as part of 2.21.0:
>
> [ARTEMIS-3522] - Implement performance tools to evaluate throughput
> and Response Under Load
+1 (non-binding)
I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient -->
https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/338
It's all green.
To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image with the release
candidate binaries. Feel free to use it run your tests -->
On 3/22/22 17:32, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0 release.
We added these new features as part of 2.21.0:
[ARTEMIS-3522] - Implement performance tools to evaluate throughput
and Response Under Load performance of Artemis
[ARTEMIS-3638] - MQTT 5
+1 ( not binding )
Thanks & Regards
Amit Aggarwal of Shiva
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 17:52, Francesco Nigro wrote:
> +1 (not binding)
>
> Il mer 23 mar 2022, 08:40 Domenico Francesco Bruscino <
> bruscin...@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > * Checked parent version in
+1 (not binding)
Il mer 23 mar 2022, 08:40 Domenico Francesco Bruscino
ha scritto:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include
> pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.20.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./`
> * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11
+1 (non binding)
* Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include
pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.20.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./`
* Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11
* Checked the web console using `Google Chrome`
* Checked producing, browsing and consuming
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0 release.
We added these new features as part of 2.21.0:
[ARTEMIS-3522] - Implement performance tools to evaluate throughput
and Response Under Load performance of Artemis
[ARTEMIS-3638] - MQTT 5
[ARTEMIS-3670] - Diverting to multiple
17 matches
Mail list logo
