+1
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:26 PM, nigro_franz wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > * Built from source and ran tests
> > * Ran from binary vs a load generator
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
+1
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:26 PM, nigro_franz wrote:
> +1
>
> * Built from source and ran tests
> * Ran from binary vs a load generator
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Artemis-2-2-0-tp4728886p4728940.html
>
+1
* Built from source and ran tests
* Ran from binary vs a load generator
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Artemis-2-2-0-tp4728886p4728940.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 07/25/2017 02:28 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 2.2.0 release.
I would like to highlight these following new features on this release:
[ARTEMIS-821] - Support scheduled messages with the STOMP protocol
[ARTEMIS-1182] - Add / Port in support for
+1 (non binding)
Build from src
deployed
ran basic queue and topic jms flow
Deployed binaries
ran latency and ramp up throughput tests
No performance regression in fact as seen already pre tag slight improvement
seen.
Issues/Bug personally raised or fixed expected in this release rechecked and
+1 (non-binding) to release.
- it builds
- its stable
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:28 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 2.2.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight these following new features on this release:
>
> [ARTEMIS-821] -
I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 2.2.0 release.
I would like to highlight these following new features on this release:
[ARTEMIS-821] - Support scheduled messages with the STOMP protocol
[ARTEMIS-1182] - Add / Port in support for JNDIReferenceFactory and JNDIStorable
[ARTEMIS-1235] -