Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Hiram Chirino
Hi Jim, Actually, I was working on the dependency problem last yesterday / last night. I went with the solution that has been working for us very well in the Java space. And that's using a maven style remote repository to store deployed artifacts. I've updated the nant builds so that they auto

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Hiram Chirino
Just remembered.. I need to check to see if I can update the VS project files to refer to dependencies from the local repo... Otherwise I think I'm gonna have to copy them into the $project/lib folder as part of the build process. On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jim,

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Hiram Chirino
Yay.. your able to use environment variables in the VS project files. I've now updated them to also refer to the nant repo to look for dependencies. On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just remembered.. I need to check to see if I can update the VS project files to refer to

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Hiram Chirino
And yes nant was a sort of requirement before.. It's the only build system that works across frameworks and we do want to support mono too. It also will detect and compile against all available frameworks on your machine. So we will use it at least when we are doing release builds. On 11/1/07,

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Hiram Chirino
Ok.. I got it setup for the NMS.ActiveMQ module. Easy enough. Please let me know if that's what you were requesting.. I'll replicated that to the other modules if it's what you were looking for. On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok.. I'll try out setting up the extenal vendor

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Jim Gomes
Yes, that is what I was going for. I originally had not placed the Apache.NMS in a vendor sub-directory, but I'm OK with that. I really like the external repository reference when doing a checkout. The other projects are easy to change as well, except for MSMQ. It still had a dependency on the

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Jim Gomes
Sorry, I meant the patch I posted to [AMQNET-72]. Reference the Apache.NMS.MSMQ-VendorSolution.patch file. On 11/1/07, Jim Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, that is what I was going for. I originally had not placed the Apache.NMS in a vendor sub-directory, but I'm OK with that. I really

Re: Namespace Reorg

2007-11-01 Thread Jim Gomes
Hi Hiram, It looks like we are missing the vs2005-stomp-tests.csproj in the new organization. This should be included as part of the Apache.NMS.ActiveMQproject and added to the vs2005-activemq.sln file. Thanks, Jim On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok.. I got it setup for

Namespace Reorg

2007-10-31 Thread Jim Gomes
[Subject was: NMS Tibco Code Drop is In!] I have downloaded the latest code (Revision 590826) and have begun playing with it. There are some definite advantages and disadvantages to this new structure. The new structure breaks out the provider implementations into independent projects. The