+1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.0 release.
>
> The release notes can be found here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> version=12342903&=12315920
>
> There
Before someone asks on the VOTE Thread.. I wanted to point out that I
made a small project to parse git commit and generate a report.
I have ran the report on top of artemis and I'm adding a commit report
here that can be useful at least on the voter's thread:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.0 release.
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12342903&=12315920
There is a new commits report I made that I'm introducing on this release:
I have been pushing this for a few weeks. I thought it was more than
clear. I didn’t mean to get anyone by surprise.
Along the conversation here 2.5.1 will just be renamed as 2.6.0.
I’m traveling today and I wanted to tag and upload from home. And I wanted
something to do tonight at the
On 05/16/2018 11:09 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I just tagged as 2.6.0... It's uploading...
I will cleanup JIRA tonight / tomorrow.. should send the voting thread
soon (tonight or tomorrow)
This seems a bit backwards to me. I'd think in the future it'd be nice
to send some notice before you
To clarify, Ragnar is referring to the NMS.AMQP rework proposed earlier on
the dev list.
I believe what was agreed to in principle was to donate the contents of our
github repo:
https://github.com/cjwmorgan-sol-sys/nms-amqp
To replace the contents of the existing NMS.AMQP repo:
Thanks MichaelAndrePearce. we will take a look at it
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
I just tagged as 2.6.0... It's uploading...
I will cleanup JIRA tonight / tomorrow.. should send the voting thread
soon (tonight or tomorrow)
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I have been clearing the testsuite. Other guys are working with me
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089
@RaiSaurabh
> ReplicatedPolicyConfiguration::quorumVoteWait I did not change to final
as the value will remain the default value until not changed from the
configuration
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089
@franz1981 Thanks for the review further.
ReplicatedPolicyConfiguration::quorumVoteWait I did not change to final as the
value will remain the default value until not changed from the
Github user gaohoward commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2090#discussion_r188604772
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/amq/AMQSession.java
---
Github user gaohoward commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2090#discussion_r188604794
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/amq/AMQSession.java
---
GitHub user RaiSaurabh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2091
ARTEMIS-1870:Missing documentation for parameter jdbc-journal-sync-period
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089
@RaiSaurabh Good job!! `ReplicatedPolicyConfiguration::quorumVoteWait` is
still not final and expose setter when not needed
---
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089
I have replied and added changes that you suggested and also updated the
documentation. Could you please review.
---
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089#discussion_r188589717
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/cluster/ha/ReplicatedPolicy.java
---
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089#discussion_r188589506
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/cluster/qourum/SharedNothingBackupQuorum.java
---
@@ -90,6
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089#discussion_r188589019
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/cluster/qourum/SharedNothingBackupQuorum.java
---
@@ -297,7
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2090#discussion_r188532813
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/amq/AMQSession.java
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2090#discussion_r188530577
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/amq/AMQSession.java
---
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2090
ARTEMIS-1868 Openwire doesn't add delivery count in client ack mode
If a client ack mode consumer receives a message and closes without
acking it, the redelivery of the message
21 matches
Mail list logo