I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3 release.
This release has many bug fixes and a few performance improvements,
and it contains exactly 100 commits, covering 54 JIRAs. Thanks a lot
to all who contributed.
A report of commits can be found here:
Hi Team,
I'm in need of getting the Pending list of below details programatically
using C#.. can you please help me to get the similar details like this
appreciates your help Thanks Sridhar
memoryUsage=0
dequeueCount=0
inflightCount=0
messagesCached=0
averageEnqueueTime=0.0
This is it.. baking...
I will send the voters thread when done.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:21 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I had some issue finishing
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2281
>
>
> Now that I finished it.. I'm about to cut it..
>
> I will start the script
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2285
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2285
I ran the PR build locally and it passed. I have no idea why Travis keep
choking on this.
---
I had some issue finishing https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2281
Now that I finished it.. I'm about to cut it..
I will start the script tonight.. so if you have anything to send in,
do it with a git cherry-pick -x into 2.6.x
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:58 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2285
ARTEMIS-2065 Can't change queue routing-type between restarts
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
@tabish121 sure.. but I usually like to bring any bug fix into 2.6.x...
I will leave this one out then.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2282
@jbertram I could not bring this into 2.6.x... it did not cherry-pick.. can
you do it?
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2282
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2283
@jbertram this is not 2.6.x, right?
I don't remember back porting LegacyJMSConfiguration into 2.6.x
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
I targeted 2.7.0 in the JIRA as I don't think it is a critical fix can add
it on next cycle if you want.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2283
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
@tabish121 you ok to leave this one out of 2.6.3? we can bring it into
2.6.4
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2281
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
ARTEMIS-2067 Clean up some code in the AMQP protocol handling paths
Cleans up some of the code on the proton event handler, most noteable:
1. Fix IOCallback creation on each
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274
@gemmellr You are right: indeed I'm thinking if it makes sense to close
this considering that it will cost some perf..
I'm not aware of the lifecycle of the netty buffer used: if it
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274
Fair enough, I can see that could be argued as a bug, however are there any
uses in the broker which will do that? I don't know of any off hand.
---
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274#discussion_r214073404
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/util/NettyWritable.java
---
@@ -106,7
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274
@gemmellr It is a good precisation indeed: it is more an improvement, but
if have just allocated fixed size ByteBuf it will fail throwing an exception
even if the space is enough,
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274#discussion_r214067838
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/util/NettyWritable.java
---
@@
Github user calohmn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2273
Test failure was due to a class not changed in the commit here.
I've done an update and rebase to fix that.
---
22 matches
Mail list logo
