Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Justin Bertram
This got me thinking about who is the intended audience for the JavaDoc. It's not for folks working on the broker directly since they already have the source code and can read the JavaDoc directly. It's not for folks using JMS, AMQP, OpenWire, MQTT, or STOMP since the JavaDoc doesn't apply to any

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
That would also be nicer than having them all, though still the same amount of work on updates. Its what the 5.x docs at least aim to do (typically out of date). Another middle ground might be just automating the release details linking to the zips on maven-central, meaning its still/actually

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 19:12, Étienne Hossack wrote: > > -1 > > Reasons to keep: > * It's useful to be able to link a specific line/method in the javadoc when > explaining something to someone through the use of a URL > * It's nice to be able to navigate the source code in your browser, if say

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Clebert Suconic
*if* we keep the javadoc, I would like to only keep the latest version I don't see much point on keeping 24+ versions of the javadocs On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:12 PM Étienne Hossack wrote: > > -1 > > Reasons to keep: > * It's useful to be able to link a specific line/method in the javadoc

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Personally I read most javadocs in the IDE these days whilst using the thing in question, with IDEs grabbing it (/the source) from Maven Central as you say. For more specific things about the actual client or broker however I tend to link into their source on github these days. I dont really ever

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Étienne Hossack
-1 Reasons to keep: * It's useful to be able to link a specific line/method in the javadoc when explaining something to someone through the use of a URL * It's nice to be able to navigate the source code in your browser, if say your IDE is having issues and you can't correctly navigate to docs

[DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-28 Thread Clebert Suconic
Can we stop publishing javadocs on the ActiveMQ Website for artemis? I see no point on publishing it as they are available in Maven. My vote is to completely remove it. So, if you agree with me, please respond with +1 Yes, stop publishing javadocs for ActiveMQ Artemis on the website and keep