Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 (RC2)

2023-09-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 9/15/23 15:40, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release. This is the 2nd Respin of the release (RC2) This was a large release overall with many improvements, and I'm proud of what we accomplished on this release. Thanks for all who contributed

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 (RC2)

2023-09-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
Just a small correction, the Maven Repository URI : https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1371 Sorry for the copy & paste mistake. On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:40 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release. >

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 (RC2)

2023-09-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release. This is the 2nd Respin of the release (RC2) This was a large release overall with many improvements, and I'm proud of what we accomplished on this release. Thanks for all who contributed to this release by both raising JIRAs or

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0

2023-09-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
-1 I made a mistake with this release.. I'm going to re-spin. On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:43 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 01:50, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release: > > > > This was a large release overall

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0

2023-09-15 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 01:50, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release: > > This was a large release overall with many improvements, and I'm proud > of what we accomplished on this release. Thanks for all who > contributed to this release by

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 6.0.0 revisited

2023-09-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Sounds good, makes sense. Thanks, Matt > On Sep 14, 2023, at 11:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > I agree and that's ActiveMQ 5.x stays with javax.jms and ActiveMQ 6.x > changes to jakarta.jms. > > So we are fully aligned and it shows that ActiveMQ 6.x is cleaner. > If users want to

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 6.0.0 revisited

2023-09-15 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Yep, I dont think anyone ever seriously considered classifiers for this for reasons like that, only the converted (inc deps) separate modules like ActiveMQ 5.18.x and Artemis have, or different versions. On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 19:10, David Blevins wrote: > > Agree. I'll also note that projects