You're welcome.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Thanks Art :)
>
> Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a
> écrit :
>
> > BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> > release.
> >
> > Maven central already has an apache-activemq
Hmm weird. I will request removal.
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
Thanks Art :)
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
The OSS Sonatype Maven Central support team can remove artifacts. Someone
(probably PMC) needs to open a JIRA about it.
https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Are there artifacts also in the Apache Dist Maven Repo?
Matt Pavlovich
> On Oct 26, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Arthur Naseef
BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0 release.
Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
6.0.0:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/apache-activemq
Perhaps we can get that one removed?
It looks like there are
+1
Jeff
On 2023/10/26 11:00:57 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's the Release Notes:
>
The default branch would align to the current release. We could have a
separate branch aimed towards the next release for adding new ones as
we go, it would be used for CI checks. We could tag older versions if
we desired...looking at others, some dont, some do.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 15:25,
+1
We'll need to think about how we want to communicate the compatibility of
each example since new examples may be added corresponding to new features
in the broker.
Justin
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 5:21 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main
On 10/26/23 06:12, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main build+repo and
into a specific repo of their own.
There are a significant number of them, most of which rarely change,
and I think it would be nicer to have them sitting standalone. Having
them
Hi all,
this vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Chris Shannon, JB Onofré, Clebert Suconic
+1 (non binding): Matt Pavlovich
I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, then
I will update Jira and the website in preparation for the
announcement.
Thanks all
+1 for me... It takes quite a lot to upload a release because of this.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think it's a good idea to separate the example:
> - they can leave with their own lifecycle
> - they don't "impact" build on the main
>
> +1 for me
>
>
+1
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:17 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Oct 26, 2023, at 6:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> > release:
> > - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on
+1 (non-binding)
> On Oct 26, 2023, at 6:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's the Release Notes:
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's the Release Notes:
>
+1 (binding)
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in archives
* Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
* Verified fix was present in release
* Ran broker from binary
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi guys,
As you probably saw, we did a bunch of ActiveMQ and Artemis releases
during the past two days.
Unfortunately, due to that, I didn't have a lot of time to complete
ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release preparation. I will back on this tonight and I
will work on this during the whole weekend. I plan to
Hi all,
I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this release:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
Here's the Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12353758
Maven Staging Repository:
Yeah, I think it's a good idea to separate the example:
- they can leave with their own lifecycle
- they don't "impact" build on the main
+1 for me
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:12 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main build+repo and
> into
I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main build+repo and
into a specific repo of their own.
There are a significant number of them, most of which rarely change,
and I think it would be nicer to have them sitting standalone. Having
them in-build somewhat complicates things as they are,
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.16.x series, bringing:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
You can find details on the Release Notes:
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.17.x series, bringing:
- improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
- add additional fields on JMX Connection MBean
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
- a
21 matches
Mail list logo
