+1 (binding)
* Reviewed PRs
* Reviewed JIRA
* Started dist build and validated with local tests
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 3:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
> This is the second RC including
If it was a matter of 1 day to include it I would prefer to wait for it.
Other than that then I’m releasing on Monday.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:40 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I'd say the answer to 'Wait for to do a release?' is usually no
> unless its about a blocking bug/regression or
I'd say the answer to 'Wait for to do a release?' is usually no
unless its about a blocking bug/regression or there's really nothing
else important ready to go. This definitely isnt that and also isnt
ready yet while other stuff is, so seems a clear no to me.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 16:58,
Having spent a while making the build much faster than it historically
was, if it was to go in the artemis repo directly I'd at least want a
way to disable building the console to allow keeping things more like
their current state, for all those times doing stuff not actually
involving the console
Should I wait for the 2.33 release ?
See my other thread about the heads up.
Or you think this may take a lot longer ?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:27 AM Andy Taylor wrote:
> The current Artemis console is based on HawtIO 1 which itself is written
> using Bootstrap. Bootstrap is old and no
I would like to try releasing Artemis 2.33.0 on Monday, March, 18...
If I miss this windo I won't be able to release that week as I will
have vacations the week after.. .on which case I would like someone
else to release or wait when I am back.
Having said that, I would like to have everything
The current Artemis console is based on HawtIO 1 which itself is written
using Bootstrap. Bootstrap is old and no longer maintained so HawtIO (v3/4)
has moved to use React and Patternfly and is also written in Typescript.
I have been working in the background over the last several months to
