+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
> We did a single improvement in this release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
>
Hi guys,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
We did a single improvement in this release:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
Here's the Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12353758
Maven Staging
(email
and website).
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
> - fix on destin
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 1:16 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.2 release.
>
> This addresses a defect introduced in the recent 2.31.1 release.
>
> The release notes can be found here:
>
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
> We did a single improvement in this release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable cla
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- fix on destinations create when message is delayed
- fix on moving message to DLQ when produce via HTTP and TTL is reached
- improvement on KahaDB memory
preparation
tomorrow.
Sorry for the delay.
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 13:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> As you probably saw, we did a bunch of ActiveMQ and Artemis releases
> during the past two days.
>
> Unfortunately, due to that, I didn't
:
>
> Thanks JB. What's to stop a malicious broker trying to recreate the
> vulnerability then by sending a crafted message to a client?
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:53 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi Colm
> >
> > It's on the
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.16.x series, bringing:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
You can find details on the Release Notes:
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.17.x series, bringing:
- improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
- add additional fields on JMX Connection MBean
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
- a
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's th
Yeah, I think it's a good idea to separate the example:
- they can leave with their own lifecycle
- they don't "impact" build on the main
+1 for me
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:12 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main build+repo and
> into
Hi all,
I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this release:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
Here's the Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12353758
Maven Staging Repository:
to submit 6.0.0 to
vote on Monday.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm glad to provide an update about ActiveMQ 6.0.0: after a full week
> of fixes, tests, etc, I made good progress. However, I still have a
> few Jira to
for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's th
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
- improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
- add additional fields on JMX Connection MBean
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
- a lot of
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
- fix on destinations create when message is delayed
- fix on moving message to DLQ when produce via HTTP and TTL is reached
- improvement on KahaDB memory
Hmm weird. I will request removal.
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
Thanks Art :)
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
Hi Colm
It's on the broker side, not on the client side. However, the change
is also on client side as it's on the openwire marshalling (shared
between the client and the broker).
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:28 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Security vendors (e.g.
>
Hi guys,
We made good progress on ActiveMQ 6.0.0 preparation, including big changes.
I still have a few changes and refactorings to do, I think I need a
couple of weeks max.
I propose to target mid October to submit ActiveMQ 6.0.0 to vote.
In the meantime, I will start to do a pass/changes on
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the reminder, I will contribute the ActiveMQ part as we
have a lot to share :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:35 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Please contribute to the next ASF board report via the following file:
>
>
thub.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/cb0ab34743d0aa073b9a28a3f1c77b571142328b/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt
>
> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 09:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Thanks for the reminder, I will contribute th
Thanks Matt,
I will do review/merge on your PRs.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:33 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hi JB-
>
> Sounds good, my changes are all merged or in pending PR (2 PRs).
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Oct 2, 2023, at 12:44 A
will keep you posted asap.
Regards
JB
Le lun. 2 oct. 2023 à 07:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> We made good progress on ActiveMQ 6.0.0 preparation, including big changes.
> I still have a few changes and refactorings to do, I think I need a
> couple of weeks max
for us
Just my $0.01
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:27 PM Francois Papon
wrote:
>
> About the features Github also have projects, roadmap, kanban
>
> I cannot see which features are missing for the common ASF projects.
>
> On 18/10/2023 11:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote
cts in Jira.
>
> So I think we would need the PMC to agree to move all the projects to GH
> for issue tracking and I don't think that support will be there to do that.
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, my point was we have the s
Hi guys,
A quick update about ActiveMQ 6.0.0.
I fixed the issues detected, I will open the corresponding PRs soon.
The target date to submit the release to vote is the end of this week.
I will keep you posted.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 7:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> H
than GH issues, but we are not using it.
If we would use Kanban, custom fields, etc, I would agree, but it's
not the case currently.
I'm a little puzzled here: I get your points and they are fair,
feedback from others is pretty positive.
So, do you think we should move to a formal move for consensus ?
, expect the vote on Wednesday :)
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:01 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> A quick update about ActiveMQ 6.0.0.
>
> I fixed the issues detected, I will open the corresponding PRs soon.
>
> The target date to submit the re
Hi guys,
Even if we are pretty busy and focused on ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release
preparation (as said in another email, I should be able to submit the
release to vote next week), I think we can anticipate a little the
future of ActiveMQ.
ActiveMQ 6.0.0 is a major milestone for the project, heading to a
gt; projects under the ActiveMQ umbrella. Using Jira has been cumbersome.
>
> Best,
> Krzysztof
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 6:05 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Even if we are pretty busy and focused on ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release
> >
Hi guys
We are finally almost ready for 5.17.1 release. Only two Jira with PRs are
under review.
I will work on these ones today.
I plan to submit 5.17.1 to vote tomorrow.
Thanks
Regards
JB
Le lun. 11 avr. 2022 à 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> Quick upd
I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> Why wait? Seems really quite odd to have a current release stream with
> one of its noted features having been an upgrade to Spring 5, and a
> coming 5.17.1 release
Done:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/830
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
major changes:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19, fixing Spring4shell vulnerability (even if
ActiveMQ is not directly impacted)
- XBean 4.21 (supporting Spring 5.x) and ASM
Hi guys,
Yesterday, we found a new issue (major) to fix for 6.0.0. I'm on it.
Once done, I will submit the release to vote: probably tonight or
tomorrow my time.
Stay tuned!
Regards
JB
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 7:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> You might have seen
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:35 PM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it
> and vote accordingly.
>
> This release contains a single bugfix[1] by Iuliia Fatkullina! Thank you!
>
> Besides that I cherry-picked notice
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:47 AM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it
> and vote accordingly. Huge kudos to Bruce Dodson for his help with
> resolving issues signaled in rc1.
>
> This release contains the
> wrote:
> >
> >> I would fix it on 5.17.x as well unless theres some reason not to that
> >> im missing, it really seems no different than it is for 5.16.x. People
> >> can upgrade to 5.17.x from <=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
> >> expect
=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
> expect to hit a breakage for this any more than they should on 5.16.x,
> since it also does not implement JMS 2 either.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 15:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Agree: I should not have changed on 5.16.x, keep it f
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:58 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1 release
>
> This is a small release following up where I added a fix for the following
> bug:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3856 -
2022 19:05:37 MESZ schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
> :
> >Hi Benjamin
> >
> >are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
> >java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
> >
> >Can you elaborate your issue ?
> >
&g
Hi Art,
I disagree: as said on Slack, it works fine with JMS 1.1 with you
provide the right bundle (thanks to dependency flag). So, it's
possible to still use JMS 1.1 bundle (geronimo) if you provide before
installing the activemq-client feature.
If you don't provide jms 1.1 bundle, by default,
6.2 before?
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
> >
> > javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
> >
> > So:
> > 1. if your application uses the same range, it
By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
So:
1. if your application uses the same range, it works
2. if your application use [1.1,2), than, simple add javax.jms
(geronimo) 1.1 bundle
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:45 PM Arthur Naseef wrote:
>
> I
Hi Benjamin
are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
Can you elaborate your issue ?
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:43 PM Benjamin Graf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OSGi bundles are not playing well because of update to
>
change so users can know about the issue before
> they upgrade.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-osgi bundle, not
> >
for
> using 2 if already supplied, falling back to using its provided 1.1 if
> they dont?
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 14:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-osgi bund
as directly from the
> Import-Package manifest entry of the 5.16.3 and 5.16.5 activemq-client
> jars on maven central. On checking 5.17.1 it lists the same.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > activemq-client 5.16.3 does use the right ran
ue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I tested at runtime on activemq-osgi bundle used by activemq-client.
>
> The feature verify would not work with this range.
>
> Let me take a look but I doubt it's the case.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 a
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:05 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release.
>
> As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of
> Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs.
>
>
>
> The release notes can be found
Hi guys,
I've started to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release.
This release will include several dependency updates, and fixes
detected on 5.17.0/5.17.1.
I will keep you posted soon with more details, but roughly, I plan to
submit the release to vote by the end of next week.
Regards
JB
Hi
Agree to close this vote and prepare a New one soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 10 juin 2022 à 23:14, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> Before I close the result, I would like to highlight ARTEMIS-3856
> which is a regression I caused.
>
>
> When I fixed the ThreadLocal non static usages, I reverted
Hi
Thanks for the update. I will take a new look (I worked a bit with Etienne
about that).
Regards
JB
Le sam. 11 juin 2022 à 02:15, Nikita Shupletsov
a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> My name is Nikita Shupletsov. I am a software development engineer at
> Amazon MQ.
>
> I have been working on an
Hi Sergio,
Yes, I think you are right. I will fix that.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 2:06 AM Mendez, Sergio
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While browsing through the documentation, I went to the following URL:
>
> https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-getting-started
>
> If I scroll down
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:49 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an ActiveMQ Artemis Native 2.0.0 release
>
>
> For those who are not familiar, this is the Native Layer in Artemis
> responsible for the integration on Linux and Libaio.
>
>
> I have been
JMS 2.0 applications).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would fix it on 5
;> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would fix it on 5.17.x as well unless theres some reaso
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
>
> There are two features added as part of this release:
>
> - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we
> don't have any
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on configuration when wrapper is use
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on confi
the files (the bin tar.gz) is still
> > > 404'ing for me on some occasions on 1 network and always on another.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 13:16, Robbie Gemmell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have asked on infras slack channel a
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series, including:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19
- upgrade to XBean 4.21
- upgrade to Jackson 2.13.2/2.13.2.2
- upgrade to Jolokia 1.7.1
- upgrade to ASM 9.3 for
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series, including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory leak on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ with pending STOMP
-1 for leader/follower, it doesn't apply for current master/slave
mechanism, it's not the same semantic as in Kafka for instance
-1 for primary/backup, technically, this one could work, but it sounds
"confusing" to me
+1 for active/passive is probably the most accurate and describe the
behavior
Hi
Unfortunately, the image is not displayed on the mailing list.
Can you please send the test case and image to me (jbono...@apache.org) ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:22 PM Chandan Singh
wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
>
>
> I recently did an Active MQ upgrade for Spring4Shell
The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
It's more to get consensus.
I think we have a consensus.
+1 to proceed now :)
Regards
JB
Le dim. 8 mai 2022 à 05:14, Tetreault, Lucas
a écrit :
> Here is the summary of all the votes:
> [+1,1,-1,-1000,-1,-1]
Hi
Thanks for the details. Indeed it's related to the quotes in the name (in
order to able to display destinations with spaces etc in the console).
Lucas created a PR, I will review and merge. Then I will move forward on a
release soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 6 mai 2022 à 19:25, Chandan Singh
a
uncements.
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 05:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, it's OK for me too, dlcdn is up to date.
> >
> > I'm moving forward on website and announcement.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
&g
ssive.
>
> --
> Étienne
> he/him/his
>
> On Sat, 7 May 2022, at 10:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
> > It's more to get consensus.
> >
> > I think we have a consensus.
> >
> >
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0 release.
>
>
> There are no new features on this release, however there are many
> improvements and bug fixes.
>
> In particular there's a default change
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
> major changes:
> - upgrade to Spring 5.3
, website, reporter, etc). I will
do the announcement once all is done.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important release on
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory lead on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ
- add missing Jetty continuation artifact and
If there is anything I can do to help getting that in, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Kind regards,
> Endre
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
> >
> &
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
://github.com/melloware/jasypt
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:10 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of AeroViron
since
> >> it does still run on 17.
> >>
> >> I checked things out as follows:
> >> - Verified the signature and checksum files.
> >> - Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files present in the archives.
> >> - Checked headers in the source archive with:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 18:28, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.25.0 release.
>
> This JIRA improved flow control from paging preventing Out Of Memory
> issues when there's a bad consumer without flow control (ARTEMIS-3943
he ActiveMQ 5.17.2
> announcement. Many did also have release notes or release page style
> link in addition, but they all linked to a general download area.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 07:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Noted, but we need bo
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
- update to Spring 5.3.22
- update to Shiro 1.9.1
- update to log4j 2.18.0
- and much more!
Enjoy!
at 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
> >
> > https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
> >
> > This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
> >
Hi,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Spring 5.3.22 update
- Jackson 2.13.13 update
- Shiro 1.9.1 update
- Log4j 2.18.0 update
- and much more
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
Hi Jon
Thanks for the update and the PR !
I gonna take a look.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:23 PM Jonathan Gallimore
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran into an issue with building ActiveMQ on Windows with the CXF XJC
> plugin:
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
Hi,
It's already on track, with Jira and PR:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9130
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/925
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote next week.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM Peter Raymond
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the latest version of
And back to your question, jackson (including jackson-databind) is
used only in webconsole (and partition but that's rare ;)).
So basically, if you don't use/expose ActiveMQ WebConsole, you don't
have any risk. Furthermore, jackson databind is used in webconsole to
marshall/unmarshall console
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:23 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release.
>
>
> We removed ActiveMQ Artemis Rest, (which was already non functional)
> as part of this release.
> And other improvements and bug fixes.
>
Hi Clebert,
I'm +1 about this for the two reasons:
1. I don't think lot of people read the Javadoc on website (personally
I'm reading directly in the IDE)
2. We can still have the javadoc jar published on Maven (not need to
update website)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Clebert
have been. In
> >> lieu
> >> > of the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the
> >> website
> >> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> >> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we shoul
Hi Bruce,
Yes, I saw the notification.
I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from the last
one. Then, we can contribute on it, with deadline on Tuesday evening.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 6:19 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> It seems we have a board report due this
> of the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the website
> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we should just create a file
> > in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
> >
ile
> in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Yes, I saw the notification.
> >
> > I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from the las
Hi Endre,
I will take a look later today or during the weekend.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 9:42 PM Endre Stølsvik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Would it be possible to get a review of AMQ-8617?
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8617
> PR: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/843
Hi,
We have a consensus. So I will process creating a Jira and preparing a PR.
Thanks all for your feedback.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> Howe
Hi,
We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
(in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
For ActiveMQ 5.18.x, I propose to completely remove any reference to Camel.
No objection ?
mum, JMS 2.0, javax.jms, Spring 5)
> v5.19.x (JDK 11 minimum, JMS 2.0, jakarta.jms, Spring 6)
>
> -Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Jan 8, 2023, at 1:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I started to work on ActiveMQ 5.18.x major release preparat
est
> version.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Those are valid points:
> > 1. For Jakarta, I plan to change the dep and rename on dedicated
> > branch (5.19.x). The intention is to introduce breaki
301 - 400 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
