The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ
Classic 6.1.2 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 6.1.x series, bringing:
- secure Jolokia and REST Message API by default
- fix on runtimeConfigurationPlugin JMX MBean reload operation
- fix when consuming empty
larify the status of this release? Thanks!
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> This vote passed with the following result:
>>
>> +1 (binding): Chris Shannon, Tim Bish, JB Onofré, Clebert
+1
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:57 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> Following up from the previous discussion thread on this subject, I'd like
> to propose a vote for archiving the following repos:
>
> - activemq-stomp - https://github.com/apache/activemq-stomp
> - activemq-activeio -
Hi Matt,
Thanks for that.
If I may, I don't see a strong consensus yet about GH Issues. The
other thread you started contains some non accurate points (we should
have clear statements to the community for clarity).
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 5:26 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> @dev-
>
>
Hi Matt
Imho, we are mixing two topics here:
1. The ticket management system
2. The contribution guide
So, let me try to clarify:
[PROPOSAL]
I'm in favor of GH Issues, but we don't yet have a strong consensus
about that. I would propose a new thread about that to give a chance
to anyone to
and the website, then I will do the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 8 fixes, especially:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 8 fixes, especially:
> - secure Jolokia and REST API by default
> -
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.2 release to your vote.
This release includes 8 fixes, especially:
- secure Jolokia and REST API by default
- fix on runtimeConfigurationPlugin JMX MBean reload operation
- fix when consuming empty destination via REST API
- fix client/server SSL
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ
"Classic" 5.18.4 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- Spring 5.3.33 update (related to Spring CVEs)
- Jetty 9.4.54.v20240208 update
- Jackson 2.16.2 update
- log4j 2.23.1 update
- several bug
will send the
announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 5.18.4 to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series, bri
Gentle reminder on this vote: we would need one more binding vote.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 5.18.4 to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 5.18.4 to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series, bringing
> fixes and dependency updates
wrote:
>
> > Today is the last day to contribute to the board report! Please get your
> > contributions in before end-of-day (EOD) today (5pm PDT) so I can submit it.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> &
Just a reminder: even if we use GitHub Discussions, we should always
send a pointer on the mailing list. As we say at Apache: "if it
doesn't occur on the mailing list, it never occurred".
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 6:27 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Got it, that makes sense. I
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 5.18.4 to your vote.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series, bringing
fixes and dependency updates, especially:
- Spring 5.3.33 update (related to Spring CVEs)
- Jetty 9.4.54.v20240208 update
- Jackson 2.16.2 update
- log4j 2.23.1
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.1 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 6.1.x series, bringing:
- add firstMessageTimestamp in the StatisticsPlugin
- fix on Docker images authentication
- add sun.nio.* opens classes required for some transports
-
Hi,
Thanks again Justin for the detailed doc, that's a great one !
I understand the gaps you identified and agree with your points.
Regarding the comments and feedback, I think we don't have a strong
enough consensus for this move.
So I would propose to stay with Jira for now.
Thoughts ?
. The announcement will follow.
Thanks all for your vote !
PS: 5.18.4 will start tonight or tomorrow morning my time :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.1 release to your vote.
>
e fact we're considering moving
> to GitHub Issues, but I wasn't sure that's something the board would care
> about, and I wasn't sure where to add it.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > I cr
Hi Bruce,
I created a new draft (based on yours) containing ActiveMQ "classic" details.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:48 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> It is that time once again to assemble the latest ASF board report. As
> mentioned previously, I would like us to begin using
Hi Justin
Fantastic work and great summary !
I do a quick pass, I will do a more detailed read.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:52 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> There's been a few threads about this general subject, but most have
> concentrated on Classic in particular. I think
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes:
> - fix on the StatisticPlugin to include firstMessageTimestam
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.1 release to your vote.
This release includes:
- fix on the StatisticPlugin to include firstMessageTimestamp field
- Add missing JVM arg for sun.nio (required for some transport connectors)
- remove "old" client jakarta module
- fix authentication
+1 (binding) jbonofre
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 6:40 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On 3/19/24 19:12, Justin Bertram wrote:
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.33.0 release.
> >
> > Here are some noteworthy updates in 2.33.0:
> >
> > - Support for JSON formatted
Hi,
Please create a Jira account first (see
https://selfserve.apache.org/jira-account.html).
Then, create PR, we will assign the corresponding ticket when we will
receive your PRs and they are good.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 8:55 PM Anubhav Mishra
wrote:
>
> Hello Team,
>
>
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.0 release.
It's a new milestone, bringing:
- New JMS 2/3 operations support
- Mapping javax / jakarta exception in openwire protocol
- Add destination field on the job scheduler
- Add org.apache.activemq.broker.BouncyCastleNotAdded
for your vote,
Regards
JB
NB: I will already prepare a 6.1.1 soon in order to update Spring
version (a CVE has been published)
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
&
Hi,
By the way, I will update to Spring 6.1.5, 6.0.18, 5.3.33 as a new CVE
has been published.
As ActiveMQ 6.1.0 vote is almost complete, I will release this one and
prepare 6.1.1 including Spring 6.1.5 update.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 5:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
&
Gentle reminder, last chance to cast your vote :)
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
> This is the second RC including the fix on bin/activemq
Hi Stefan
Here's the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9453
I will close ActiveMQ 6.1.0 vote and promote the release, then I will
submit 5.18.4 to vote.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 4:29 PM Boeltl, Stefan
wrote:
>
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Looking at
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
> This is the second RC including the fix on bin/activemq script.
>
> This release includes:
&g
Hi guys,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
This is the second RC including the fix on bin/activemq script.
This release includes:
- New JMS2/3 operations support
- Mapping javax / jakarta exception in openwire protocol
- Add destination field on the job scheduler
-
Hi all,
due to an issue on the activemq script, I cancel this vote.
I will fix and recut the release.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
>
> This rele
> need to hold the release until this is verified.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2024, at 2:05 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - Downloaded dist tar.gz archive and confirmed v
t; > - Tested web console demo examples
> > - Tested web console functions
> > - Reviewed JIRA and release notes
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt Pavlovich
> >
> >> On Mar 5, 2024, at 11:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi gu
Hi Matt,
I think you are missing the ActiveMQ version and Spring version.
5.3.30 is the Spring version, used in ActiveMQ 5.18.x. ActiveMQ 5.18.4
will upgrade to Spring 5.3.31 fixing the CVE.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:25 PM Matthew Gay
wrote:
>
> Good Morning,
>
> We are receiving
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes:
> - New JMS2/3 operations support
> - Mapping javax / jakarta exce
Hi guys,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.0 release to your vote.
This release includes:
- New JMS2/3 operations support
- Mapping javax / jakarta exception in openwire protocol
- Add destination field on the job scheduler
- Add org.apache.activemq.broker.BouncyCastleNotAdded property to
be 6.5 or 6.6 etc. Certainly if/when a 7.0 release
> happens I would expect that to be fully Jakarta compliant with the spec.
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Matt
> >
> > Yeah, agree. It sounds good.
> >
> > I'm
e that re-uses a lot from runtime
> config plugin would provide a lot of transition support towards an
> activemq-boot mini-kernel to replace Spring/XBean.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Jan 12, 2024, at 12:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> >
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:29 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following for this release:
>
>
> * Mirrored Core Messages can now be sent in their native format
> without
It sounds good to me.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:48 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I'm aiming to release on Wed Morning... willing to delay a day if
> anyone needs it... (please ping me on this thread if a delay is
> needed).
>
>
> Otherwise if you get your PRs merged tomorrow
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:38 PM Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> As background, last week it was discovered (thanks Justin) that there was
> an oversight with the Exception handling over OpenWire with the upgrade to
> Jakarta apis in the 6.0.x broker.
>
t; > Just for the note, the 5.x branch will be update only for CVEs purpose?
> > (dependencies or source code)
> >
> > If so, which minor version of 5.x are in the maintenance mode? I guess
> > only the latest 5.18.x right?
> >
> > regards,
> >
Hi guys,
Happy new year to all !
After the festive break, I'm back on ActiveMQ :)
I would like to discuss about the roadmap for ActiveMQ
6.0.x/6.1.x/6.2.x/7.x(future):
- For 6.0.x branch, I propose to include fixes and minor dependencies
updates (I have some PRs on the way, Matt also worked on
ruce Snyder
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi JB,
>>>
>>> Ah, that's a great idea and would simplify the collection/submission
>>> process. Unfortunately, it looks like there's something wrong with
>>> Reporter, see the screenshot below:
>>>
>>
t the report.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce
> >
> > I committed the Classic part and updated some sections.
> > By the way, we can use reporter
> > (https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/?acti
Hi Bruce
I committed the Classic part and updated some sections.
By the way, we can use reporter
(https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/?activemq) for the board report
(we can create and save draft and contribute on it, then you can just
push the submit button).
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at
I'm doing the "Classic" part.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:53 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Happy new year! Best wishes in 2024!!
>
> Moments ago, we were reminded that the next ActiveMQ board report is due no
> later than Tuesday, Jan 9. This leaves less than one week, so please do
>
Hi Sophie
Which version are you using?
The situation is the same: no special properties on the message
(redelivery, ...) ?
Regards
JB
PS: this kind of message should be sent to the user mailing list
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:30 PM Sophie Borchart
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I’m running into a
*released* branch that we feel is solid to
> base LTS off of vs declaring a future unreleased branch as a LTS release.
>
> -Matt
>
> > On Dec 21, 2023, at 3:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi François,
> >
> > We discussed LTS/EOA but without com
Hi François,
We discussed LTS/EOA but without commitment yet.
The thing we agreed on is to maintain 3 branches active (so 6.0.x,
5.18.x, 5.17.x right now). The same as we do in Apache Karaf
basically. I would consider it a kind of informal LTS :)
If we need to have a concrete LTS plan, then
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release.
It's maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 6.0.x series, bringing:
- Fix Jakarta support in ActiveMQ RA
- Fix OSGi headers in activemq-jms-pool and activemq-cf
- Fix provided jetty.xml example on the SSL connector
- Fix jolokia
Hi
ActiveMQ 6.0.1 has been released
(https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/6.0.1/).
I'm working on website update and announcement right now.
However, 6.0.1 has the same JMS 3.x support as 6.0.0.
We plan to have new features implemented in 6.1.0.
Regards
JB
On Mon,
h a plan of how we are going to
> > implement it. There's multiple ways it could be done and probably
> requires
> > protocol changes. We have to decide how much work is done by the broker
> and
> > where.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> &
cide how much work is done by the broker and
> where.
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > I think it would better to complete JMS 2 in 6.1.0 including shared topic
> > subscriptions.
> > We already did 6.0.x with partial JMS
om topic subscriptions
>
> Reference:
> https://activemq.apache.org/jms2
>
> I think this would work well, since we have Virtual Topic support (which
> is better anyway).
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> > On Dec 2, 2023, at 11:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
and announce the release.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
>
> This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
> - fix Jakarta nam
Hi
I think it's really important to focus on JMS 2 complete impl for 6.1.0.
That's the most important.
I started to work on some impl, a couple are a little longer to impl,
require tests etc.
I don't think early January is reasonable. I would rather try at the
end of January.
I would rather:
1.
Hi Abhisek
ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release is currently in voting.
It fixes the issue on ActiveMQ RAR.
It should be officially released during the weekend.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 5:18 AM Abhisek Swain
wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Can you please update on the ETA or timelines for ActiveMQ 6.0.1
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
>
> This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
> - fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA
> - fix
Hi guys,
Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
- fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA
- fix OSGi headers in activemq-cf and activemq-jms-pool
- fix jolokia conf on Windows wrapper
- fix Jetty secure connector example
Severity: Medium
Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ before 5.16.6
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.0 before 5.17.4
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.0 unaffected
- Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 unaffected
Description:
Once an user is authenticated on Jolokia, he can potentially trigger arbitrary
code execution.
In
Done !
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:09 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hey JB-
>
> Sounds good! Go for it.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Nov 20, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Actuall
Hi
Actually, I'm on it as I'm starting to prepare 6.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
Give me 10mn and I will push it.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 3:52 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Heads up—
>
> I’m planning to branch main as activemq-6.0.x and then renumber main to
> 6.1.0-SNAPSHOT to support new
"Classic"
> code-base it will become the next major version of ActiveMQ.”
>
> It means will be ActiveMQ 7?
>
> [1] https://activemq.apache.org/
>
> Regards,
>
> Riccardo
>
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Monday, 20 November 2023 at 09:17
> To
> Riccardo Modanese
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Sunday, 19 November 2023 at 17:40
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org ,
> us...@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 has been released!
> After several weeks (months ?) of work, the ActiveMQ team is pleased
After several weeks (months ?) of work, the ActiveMQ team is pleased
to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release.
It's a major milestone for the project, starting the 6.x series, and bringing:
- Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0 support (new features will come in
the 6.x series)
- Jakarta EE namespace
related PR and I will update the website with
javadoc, announcement, etc.
Then, I will do the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache Ac
that come up that require us to release
> 6.1.0 much faster than shared durables or shared subs will be ready so the
> only thing we can really say is it will be available at some point in a 6.x
> release
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
The first support has started in ActiveMQ 6.0.0 currently in vote.
However, some features are not fully implemented, it's planned for
6.1/6.2 releases.
For instance, regarding Shared Durable Topic, you can see some method
throwing IllegalStateException("Operation not supported by a
+1 (binding)
I did the same tests I did during release preparation :)
Some fixes/polish to do for 6.0.1 but nothing blocker :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache Ac
Hi guys,
After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
release to your vote.
This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x series.
It's the second RC where we fixed AMQ-9388 detected during the first vote.
This release includes a bunch of changes,
Hi guys,
We found a blocker in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9388
I cancel this vote to fix and prepare a new one.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apa
jira/browse/AMQ-9388 and
> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1117
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 2:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
> > release to your vote
Hi guys,
After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
release to your vote.
This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x series.
This release includes a bunch of changes, especially:
- Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0, JMS 1.1 (still work to do to be
Hi guys,
Yesterday, we found a new issue (major) to fix for 6.0.0. I'm on it.
Once done, I will submit the release to vote: probably tonight or
tomorrow my time.
Stay tuned!
Regards
JB
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 7:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> You might have seen
:
>
> Thanks JB. What's to stop a malicious broker trying to recreate the
> vulnerability then by sending a crafted message to a client?
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:53 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi Colm
> >
> > It's on the
Hi Colm
It's on the broker side, not on the client side. However, the change
is also on client side as it's on the openwire marshalling (shared
between the client and the broker).
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:28 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Security vendors (e.g.
>
preparation
tomorrow.
Sorry for the delay.
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 13:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> As you probably saw, we did a bunch of ActiveMQ and Artemis releases
> during the past two days.
>
> Unfortunately, due to that, I didn't
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 1:16 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.2 release.
>
> This addresses a defect introduced in the recent 2.31.1 release.
>
> The release notes can be found here:
>
Hmm weird. I will request removal.
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
Thanks Art :)
Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Arthur Naseef a écrit :
> BTW, I just found this while doing something unrelated to our 6.0.0
> release.
>
> Maven central already has an apache-activemq artifact released with version
> 6.0.0:
>
>
for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's th
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this
> release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
> Here's th
to submit 6.0.0 to
vote on Monday.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm glad to provide an update about ActiveMQ 6.0.0: after a full week
> of fixes, tests, etc, I made good progress. However, I still have a
> few Jira to
Hi all,
I submit ActiveMQ 5.15.16 to your vote. We did one improvement on this release:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
Here's the Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12353758
Maven Staging Repository:
Yeah, I think it's a good idea to separate the example:
- they can leave with their own lifecycle
- they don't "impact" build on the main
+1 for me
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:12 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I'd like to move the artemis examples out of the main build+repo and
> into
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.16.x series, bringing:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
You can find details on the Release Notes:
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.17.x series, bringing:
- improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
- add additional fields on JMX Connection MBean
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
- a
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- fix on destinations create when message is delayed
- fix on moving message to DLQ when produce via HTTP and TTL is reached
- improvement on KahaDB memory
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
> We did a single improvement in this release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable cla
announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
> - improvement on KahaDB memory c
(email
and website).
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
> - fix on destin
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
> We did a single improvement in this release:
> - improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
>
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
> - improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
> - fix on destinations create when message
Hi guys,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.7 release to your vote.
We did a single improvement in this release:
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
Here's the Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12353758
Maven Staging
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.6 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
- improvement on KahaDB memory consumption
- add additional fields on JMX Connection MBean
- improvement on OpenWire marshaller on Throwable class type
- a lot of
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
- fix on destinations create when message is delayed
- fix on moving message to DLQ when produce via HTTP and TTL is reached
- improvement on KahaDB memory
1 - 100 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
