Re: [DISCUSS] Status of NMS & CMS

2019-03-19 Thread alan protasio
I'm also happy to contribute with those projects where I can. I was trying to port the NMS to .net core some time ago and I'm happy to go forward with it. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I didn't say they should be removed. I said their status should be > made clear if

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.9

2019-03-15 Thread alan protasio
+1 (non-binding) Att.. Alan Diego On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:22 AM Dejan Bosanac wrote: > +1 > > Regards > -- > Dejan Bosanac > http://sensatic.net/about > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 5:08 PM Jamie G. wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Jamie > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:28

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.8

2018-11-14 Thread alan protasio
+1 Alan Diego On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:25 AM jgenender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7

2018-10-24 Thread alan protasio
+1 :D Att.. Alan Diego On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:55 AM Arthur Naseef wrote: > +1 > > Thank you. > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:45 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Dan > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 2018, at 10:41 AM, Christopher Shannon < > > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

2018-10-20 Thread alan protasio
I think worth trying to include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7082 Cheers, On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 5:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > AMQ-7080 is flagged as improvements, not a bug. Do you consider it as > actually a bug, blocker for the release ? > >