Re: What is the best architecture to set up an activemq cluster to achieve high service and data availability
Thanks MichaelAndrePearce. we will take a look at it -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
Re: What is the best architecture to set up an activemq cluster to achieve high service and data availability
Thanks for the response art. Yes we did an RCA and found out that the corruption was caused due to abrupt termination of the broker. Be that as it may we were wondering if there was an architecture that we can adapt that would be resilient to such scenarios. But your argument makes sense. We are using NFS filesystem but if that is cause for concern, what would you recommend? Thanks again for your valuable insight, Mahee -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
What is the best architecture to set up an activemq cluster to achieve high service and data availability
We are currently in the process of setting up a highly available active-mq cluster that has 1 master and 2 slave nodes that share the same file system. However we felt this architecture might not be a safe from issues such as kahadb corruption. We recently faced an issue where the only way to start up the broker was to delete all the kahadb data as it never successfully recovered. So our question is whether we can opt for a setup that is both highly available service wise but also replicates the data in the background so that we can recover the data from a secondary node when there is a corruption of data in the primary storage node. Does active-mq support an architecture such as that? -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
