[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2193: ARTEMIS-1985: Switch from XA_RDONLY to XA_OK a...

2018-07-31 Thread clebertsuconic
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2193 pulled it into 2.6.x ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2193: ARTEMIS-1985: Switch from XA_RDONLY to XA_OK a...

2018-07-31 Thread clebertsuconic
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2193 ok.. merging .. thanks for clarifying.. I have hard a hard time following so many emails :) ---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2193: ARTEMIS-1985: Switch from XA_RDONLY to XA_OK a...

2018-07-31 Thread graben
Github user graben commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2193 Yes, I commented in Jira that either via core protocol (Artemis) and ActiveMQ are returning XA_OK. Actually all events only get prepared and therefor data loss. My test case (simple

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2193: ARTEMIS-1985: Switch from XA_RDONLY to XA_OK a...

2018-07-31 Thread clebertsuconic
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2193 @graben I wasn't sure what to do with this since there's no test.. I have no idea how to validate it yet. do you have any parallels to compare what would be the proper

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2193: ARTEMIS-1985: Switch from XA_RDONLY to XA_OK a...

2018-07-31 Thread graben
Github user graben commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2193 @clebertsuconic : Friendly reminder :-) ---