Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in Wed...

[Clebert Suconic]

Lets do this release without this one... and we can do it on the next.
I can't make the test to run correctly.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:09 PM Clebert Suconic
 wrote:
>
> Let me work on it tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:51 PM Roskvist Anton  
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would be great if https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4705 could 
>> be considered for merging, it has been bothering me for quite some time... 
>> provided the PR looks good of course. If it needs further verification or 
>> work there's always next release :)
>>
>> Br,
>> Anton
>>
>> This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may 
>> contain privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the 
>> individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or 
>> copy this e-mail (including its attachments), or any part thereof. If this 
>> e-mail is received in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
>> e-mail and make sure that this e-mail (including its attachments), and all 
>> copies thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further 
>> note that when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we 
>> process your personal data. See our privacy policy for more information 
>> about how we process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in Wed...

[Clebert Suconic]

Let me work on it tomorrow.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:51 PM Roskvist Anton 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Would be great if https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4705
> could be considered for merging, it has been bothering me for quite some
> time... provided the PR looks good of course. If it needs further
> verification or work there's always next release :)
>
> Br,
> Anton
>
> This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may
> contain privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or
> copy this e-mail (including its attachments), or any part thereof. If this
> e-mail is received in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and make sure that this e-mail (including its attachments), and all
> copies thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further
> note that when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we
> process your personal data. See our privacy policy for more information
> about how we process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html
>

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in Wed...

[Roskvist Anton]

Hi,

Would be great if https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4705 could be 
considered for merging, it has been bothering me for quite some time... 
provided the PR looks good of course. If it needs further verification or work 
there's always next release :)

Br,
Anton

This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may contain 
privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the individual 
and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail (including 
its attachments), or any part thereof. If this e-mail is received in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and make sure that this 
e-mail (including its attachments), and all copies thereof, are immediately 
deleted from your system. Please further note that when you communicate with us 
via email or visit our website we process your personal data. See our privacy 
policy for more information about how we process it: 
https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in Wed...

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

It sounds good to me.

Thanks
Regards
JB

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:48 PM Clebert Suconic
 wrote:
>
> I'm aiming to release on Wed Morning... willing to delay a day if
> anyone needs it... (please ping me on this thread if a delay is
> needed).
>
>
> Otherwise if you get your PRs merged tomorrow and before then they
> will be part of the release :)
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in Wed...

[Clebert Suconic]

I'm aiming to release on Wed Morning... willing to delay a day if
anyone needs it... (please ping me on this thread if a delay is
needed).


Otherwise if you get your PRs merged tomorrow and before then they
will be part of the release :)

-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release

[Roskvist Anton]

Much appreciated, thanks!

This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may contain 
privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the individual 
and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail (including 
its attachments), or any part thereof. If this e-mail is received in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and make sure that this 
e-mail (including its attachments), and all copies thereof, are immediately 
deleted from your system. Please further note that when you communicate with us 
via email or visit our website we process your personal data. See our privacy 
policy for more information about how we process it: 
https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release

[Clebert Suconic]

I merged the compressed large message one... but I'm a bit concerned
with one change on the bridge. I would defer the bridge to next
version.. but we don't need to wait that long again for next release..
it could be a very short window.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:57 PM Justin Bertram  wrote:
>
> Both of those PRs have conflicts now. Resolve and rebase and I'll look to
> merge them. Thanks!
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 2:45 PM Roskvist Anton 
> wrote:
>
> > Looking forward to a new release, though if the following PRs are looking
> > good I would really appreciate if they could be considered for the 2.29.0
> > release as well.
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4383
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4382
> >
> > Nothing major but would solve a couple of small annoyances for one of my
> > use cases. Thanks!
> >
> > This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may
> > contain privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the
> > individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> > intended recipient of this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or
> > copy this e-mail (including its attachments), or any part thereof. If this
> > e-mail is received in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
> > e-mail and make sure that this e-mail (including its attachments), and all
> > copies thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further
> > note that when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we
> > process your personal data. See our privacy policy for more information
> > about how we process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html
> >



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release

[Justin Bertram]

Both of those PRs have conflicts now. Resolve and rebase and I'll look to
merge them. Thanks!


Justin

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 2:45 PM Roskvist Anton 
wrote:

> Looking forward to a new release, though if the following PRs are looking
> good I would really appreciate if they could be considered for the 2.29.0
> release as well.
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4383
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4382
>
> Nothing major but would solve a couple of small annoyances for one of my
> use cases. Thanks!
>
> This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may
> contain privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or
> copy this e-mail (including its attachments), or any part thereof. If this
> e-mail is received in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and make sure that this e-mail (including its attachments), and all
> copies thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further
> note that when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we
> process your personal data. See our privacy policy for more information
> about how we process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html
>

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release

[Roskvist Anton]

Looking forward to a new release, though if the following PRs are looking good 
I would really appreciate if they could be considered for the 2.29.0 release as 
well.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4383
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4382

Nothing major but would solve a couple of small annoyances for one of my use 
cases. Thanks!

This email message (including its attachments) is confidential and may contain 
privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the individual 
and/or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this e-mail you may not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail (including 
its attachments), or any part thereof. If this e-mail is received in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and make sure that this 
e-mail (including its attachments), and all copies thereof, are immediately 
deleted from your system. Please further note that when you communicate with us 
via email or visit our website we process your personal data. See our privacy 
policy for more information about how we process it: 
https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release

[Clebert Suconic]

I have been postponing for a while, where I had previously said I
would release... (because of a few small issues I was dealing with).


I think we are in a good position and I would like to do a release
today afternoon. I don't want to delay it until tomorrow as I am going
to have a week of vacation next week and if I don't do this today I
will lose my window of opportunity.



(Unless someone would like me to delay it: On that case be warned that
you would be volunteering yourself to replace me as the release
manager :) )

-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release next Friday, one week from now

[Clebert Suconic]

I'm a bit late as I was fixing a PR around paging and max -messages
(by count)..

so I am doing the release hopefully tomorrow in 24 hours.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:59 PM Clebert Suconic
 wrote:
>
> ${Subject} goes here...
>
>
> I am planning a release for ActiveMQ Artemis (2.21.0) end of next week..
>
> please use this thread to communicate on anything that needs to be
> included... (you can use github comments as well on a PR or something
> like that..  but please also mention it here to make sure I won't miss
> the context before the release).



-- 
Clebert Suconic

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release next Friday, one week from now

[Clebert Suconic]

${Subject} goes here...


I am planning a release for ActiveMQ Artemis (2.21.0) end of next week..

please use this thread to communicate on anything that needs to be
included... (you can use github comments as well on a PR or something
like that..  but please also mention it here to make sure I won't miss
the context before the release).

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Clebert Suconic]

Nope.

I wanted to finish this Pr first that I kept stuck on:




https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3633





On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 4:26 AM Christoph Läubrich 
wrote:

> Just in case I missed it, is the release out already?
>
> Am 17.05.21 um 20:23 schrieb Clebert Suconic:
> > I got stuck into an issue at work... and I'm reviewing my schedule
> > now... I will update it later this week... sorry about any
> > inconvenience.
> >
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM Christoph Läubrich 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Are there any schedule for the new release?
> >>
> >> Am 22.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Clebert Suconic:
> >>> I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting
> >>> out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> (the PR is in good shape for a review already:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3545 and i would
> >>> appreciate reviews)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm adding tests and fixing minor things now... and I plan to release
> >>> as soon as this is merged.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm also pending on ARTEMIS-3241 for the release... please here with
> >>> any progress as the release is depending on that as well.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
>  recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
>  possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
>  the folks familiar with the console bits.
> 
>  I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
>  that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd
> 
>  Robbie
> 
>  On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.
> >
> > I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
> > like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
> > next Wednesday.
> >
> >
> > I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
> > current task.
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Christoph Läubrich]

Just in case I missed it, is the release out already?

Am 17.05.21 um 20:23 schrieb Clebert Suconic:

I got stuck into an issue at work... and I'm reviewing my schedule
now... I will update it later this week... sorry about any
inconvenience.

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM Christoph Läubrich  wrote:


Are there any schedule for the new release?

Am 22.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Clebert Suconic:

I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting
out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week.


(the PR is in good shape for a review already:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3545 and i would
appreciate reviews)


I'm adding tests and fixing minor things now... and I plan to release
as soon as this is merged.


I'm also pending on ARTEMIS-3241 for the release... please here with
any progress as the release is depending on that as well.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robbie Gemmell  wrote:


The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
the folks familiar with the console bits.

I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd

Robbie

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic  wrote:


I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.

I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
next Wednesday.


I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
current task.

--
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Clebert Suconic]

I got stuck into an issue at work... and I'm reviewing my schedule
now... I will update it later this week... sorry about any
inconvenience.

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM Christoph Läubrich  wrote:
>
> Are there any schedule for the new release?
>
> Am 22.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Clebert Suconic:
> > I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting
> > out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week.
> >
> >
> > (the PR is in good shape for a review already:
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3545 and i would
> > appreciate reviews)
> >
> >
> > I'm adding tests and fixing minor things now... and I plan to release
> > as soon as this is merged.
> >
> >
> > I'm also pending on ARTEMIS-3241 for the release... please here with
> > any progress as the release is depending on that as well.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robbie Gemmell  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
> >> recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
> >> possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
> >> the folks familiar with the console bits.
> >>
> >> I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
> >> that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
> >> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd
> >>
> >> Robbie
> >>
> >> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic  
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.
> >>>
> >>> I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
> >>> like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
> >>> next Wednesday.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
> >>> current task.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Christoph Läubrich]

Are there any schedule for the new release?

Am 22.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Clebert Suconic:

I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting
out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week.


(the PR is in good shape for a review already:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3545 and i would
appreciate reviews)


I'm adding tests and fixing minor things now... and I plan to release
as soon as this is merged.


I'm also pending on ARTEMIS-3241 for the release... please here with
any progress as the release is depending on that as well.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robbie Gemmell  wrote:


The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
the folks familiar with the console bits.

I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd

Robbie

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic  wrote:


I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.

I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
next Wednesday.


I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
current task.

--
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Clebert Suconic]

I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting
out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week.


(the PR is in good shape for a review already:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3545 and i would
appreciate reviews)


I'm adding tests and fixing minor things now... and I plan to release
as soon as this is merged.


I'm also pending on ARTEMIS-3241 for the release... please here with
any progress as the release is depending on that as well.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
>
> The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
> recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
> possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
> the folks familiar with the console bits.
>
> I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
> that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd
>
> Robbie
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic  
> wrote:
> >
> > I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.
> >
> > I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
> > like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
> > next Wednesday.
> >
> >
> > I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
> > current task.
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Robbie Gemmell]

The LICENSE file in the binary archive came up in some changes in a
recent PR, and it became clear it needs an overhaul for improper (and
possibly stale) console deps entries. I raised
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3241 to track that for
the folks familiar with the console bits.

I just looked and the NOTICE file its date is stale, I've just updated
that myself as the change needed is fairly obvious:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/d6ee91a50591e37ccf5e3a630b2bfdc2c8ed47bd

Robbie

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Clebert Suconic  wrote:
>
> I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.
>
> I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
> like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
> next Wednesday.
>
>
> I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
> current task.
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

[Clebert Suconic]

I plan a release some time after the middle of next week.

I am working on an improvement over broker connections, and I would
like to push a release after I'm finished, what should happen around
next Wednesday.


I will update here with a more precise date when I'm finished with my
current task.

-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in week.

[Clebert Suconic]

I'm working on cutting 2.6.1 now..

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Clebert Suconic
 wrote:
> I have the payload for 2.6.1 pretty much defined here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/compare/2.6.0...2.6.x
>
>
> I just want to include the work I'm doing now on some Bridge working
> and AMQP, which will be cherry-picked into 2.6.x:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1858
>
>
> Please let me know if anyone has anything else to include into 2.6.1..
> .My plan is to do it as soon as I finish ARTEMIS-1858. I expect to be
> done by tuesday end of the day.. but estimate tasks completion is not
> an exact science..So Wed the latest.
>
>
> If anyone has anything to add into 2.6.1 please let me know here.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Clebert Suconic
>  wrote:
>> Good point...
>>
>> Just created 2.6.x
>>
>>
>> However.. if I need to pick everything from master.. .I will just do
>> the following:
>>
>> git checkout 2.6.x
>> git pulll --rebase apache master
>>
>>
>> And in case I find things that are not supposed to be on 2.6.1.. i
>> will use cherry-picking.
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Timothy Bish  wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2018 02:03 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:

 As we talked during the voting thread, we will follow up 2.6.0 with a
 short 2.6.1 in 1 week from now.


 meanwhile... please try to not break anything :)

>>> Branch now and cherry-pick, then it doesn't matter if anyone breaks
>>> anything,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Bish
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in week.

[Clebert Suconic]

I have the payload for 2.6.1 pretty much defined here:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/compare/2.6.0...2.6.x


I just want to include the work I'm doing now on some Bridge working
and AMQP, which will be cherry-picked into 2.6.x:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1858


Please let me know if anyone has anything else to include into 2.6.1..
.My plan is to do it as soon as I finish ARTEMIS-1858. I expect to be
done by tuesday end of the day.. but estimate tasks completion is not
an exact science..So Wed the latest.


If anyone has anything to add into 2.6.1 please let me know here.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Clebert Suconic
 wrote:
> Good point...
>
> Just created 2.6.x
>
>
> However.. if I need to pick everything from master.. .I will just do
> the following:
>
> git checkout 2.6.x
> git pulll --rebase apache master
>
>
> And in case I find things that are not supposed to be on 2.6.1.. i
> will use cherry-picking.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Timothy Bish  wrote:
>> On 05/21/2018 02:03 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>>
>>> As we talked during the voting thread, we will follow up 2.6.0 with a
>>> short 2.6.1 in 1 week from now.
>>>
>>>
>>> meanwhile... please try to not break anything :)
>>>
>> Branch now and cherry-pick, then it doesn't matter if anyone breaks
>> anything,
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in week.

[Clebert Suconic]

Good point...

Just created 2.6.x


However.. if I need to pick everything from master.. .I will just do
the following:

git checkout 2.6.x
git pulll --rebase apache master


And in case I find things that are not supposed to be on 2.6.1.. i
will use cherry-picking.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Timothy Bish  wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 02:03 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>
>> As we talked during the voting thread, we will follow up 2.6.0 with a
>> short 2.6.1 in 1 week from now.
>>
>>
>> meanwhile... please try to not break anything :)
>>
> Branch now and cherry-pick, then it doesn't matter if anyone breaks
> anything,
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in week.

[Timothy Bish]

On 05/21/2018 02:03 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:

As we talked during the voting thread, we will follow up 2.6.0 with a
short 2.6.1 in 1 week from now.


meanwhile... please try to not break anything :)

Branch now and cherry-pick, then it doesn't matter if anyone breaks 
anything,


--
Tim Bish

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release in week.

[Clebert Suconic]

As we talked during the voting thread, we will follow up 2.6.0 with a
short 2.6.1 in 1 week from now.


meanwhile... please try to not break anything :)

-- 
Clebert Suconic