Re: [I] Need postgres with graph extensions running on windows OS [age]

jrgemignani commented on issue #1542: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1542#issuecomment-1931089486 @MironAtHome Thank you! This would definitely be helpful to others. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [I] Need postgres with graph extensions running on windows OS [age]

MironAtHome commented on issue #1542: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1542#issuecomment-1931067828 I got the application to compile for branch release/PG15/1.5.0 If it works out will create a fork and some instructions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE 1.5.0 Release for PostgreSQL 14

It'd be great to have this release out I've checked the following: - Signature and hash - License and notice - Links and tags - No unexpected binary files Cheers. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:20 AM John Gemignani wrote: > Dear Apache Community, > > We would like to open a discussion for the

[DISCUSS] Apache AGE 1.5.0 Release for PostgreSQL 14

Dear Apache Community, We would like to open a discussion for the Apache AGE release 1.5.0 for PostgreSQL 14. To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/ Functionalities included and addressed in this release are:

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache AGE 1.5.0 Release for PostgreSQL 15

Dear Apache Community, The vote successfully passed with 4 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding) votes. There were no 0 or -1 votes. Following are the detailed results: Total of 6 (+1) votes. 4 +1 (binding) Muhammad Shoaib Dehowe Feng Rafsun Masud Eya Badal 2 +1 (non-binding) Muhammad

[PR] ci: Use GITHUB_OUTPUT envvar instead of set-output command [age-website]

arunsathiya opened a new pull request, #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/251 `save-state` and `set-output` commands used in GitHub Actions are deprecated and [GitHub recommends using environment

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.5.0 Release for PostgreSQL 15

Dear Apache Community, We would like to thank everyone who participated in the voting process. We are now closing this vote and will be sending out the results shortly. Again, thank you for your time and effort. John Gemignani On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:14 PM Eya Badal wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [I] Support for PIPE operator for apache-age-python client [age]

rafsun42 commented on issue #865: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/865#issuecomment-1930777999 @thjbdvlt PR #1452 implements multiple label support. It has not been approved yet, but you can try it out. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.5.0 Release for PostgreSQL 15

+1 (binding) Checked: - Signature and hash - License and notice - Links and tags - No unexpected binary files Great Job!! On 2024/02/01 18:23:37 John Gemignani wrote: > Dear Apache Community, > > Please carefully read all instructions as they may have changed since the > last vote thread. >

Re: [I] The Go driver becomes "undefined: parser", and the application cannot be built. [age]

jrgemignani commented on issue #1455: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1455#issuecomment-1930541721 @maehara-n If you can get it to work with your app, then I'm not sure what the issue is. The most that I can do is to add, remove, or update files, if necessary. I am only able to

[I] [OSSC] Add Apache AGE in awesome-postgres [age]

rafsun42 opened a new issue, #1563: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1563 ### Description Add Apache AGE in the curated list of Awesome Postgres. https://github.com/dhamaniasad/awesome-postgres ### Required Skills - Basic Git\GitHub skill (i.e. sending PR)

Re: [I] Why does the cypher query takes longer than normal SQL query? [age]

MatheusFarias03 commented on issue #1555: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1555#issuecomment-1930384915 Sure! Thank you for the help John! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [I] Why does the cypher query takes longer than normal SQL query? [age]

MatheusFarias03 closed issue #1555: Why does the cypher query takes longer than normal SQL query? URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1555 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] Why does the cypher query takes longer than normal SQL query? [age]

jrgemignani commented on issue #1555: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1555#issuecomment-1930290766 @MatheusFarias03 Btw, if this satisfactorily answers your question, consider closing the ticket :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [I] Support for PIPE operator for apache-age-python client [age]

thjbdvlt commented on issue #865: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/865#issuecomment-1929027773 hi, i face a situation where the pipe-OR operator would be usefull, so as my situation is pretty simple i describe here. this is the query i tried, in which i want to match