This would be a great release for AGE.
I've checked the following:
- Signature and hash
- License and notice
- Links and tags
- No unexpected binary files
Cheers.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 7:59 AM John Gemignani
wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to open a discussion for the
jrgemignani commented on issue #1522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1522#issuecomment-1958485554
@alteck45 I'm also a bit confused by `ap.id` what `id` are you referring to
or expecting? An `id` that **you** set in the properties or the `id` of the
vertex that is generated when
jrgemignani commented on issue #1522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1522#issuecomment-1958474851
@alteck45 This index won't be used -
`CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ap_id ON "test-graph"."AccessPoint" USING btree
(agtype_access_operator(properties, '"id"'));`
due to the
Checked and verified the following:
* Tag
* Hash
* Signature
* Link
Eya Badal
On 2024/02/16 23:58:42 John Gemignani wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to open a discussion for the Apache AGE release 1.5.0 for
> PostgreSQL 13.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see
Dear Apache AGE Community,
As the Apache AGE chair and a core contributor, I am eager to learn about the
diverse ways you've been using Apache AGE. Understanding your use cases is
crucial for us to build relevant case studies and use-case documentation that
can benefit the whole community.
Checked the following:
- Tag
- Hash
- Signature
- Link
--
*Rafsun Masud*
rafsu...@bitnine.net
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:59 PM John Gemignani
wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to open a discussion for the Apache AGE release 1.5.0 for
> PostgreSQL 13.
>
> To
jrgemignani commented on issue #1522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1522#issuecomment-1958148200
@alteck45 Could you provide a simple sample set so that we can try to
reproduce this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
