Thank you everyone for your reviews and votes. I will now close this discussion
and open the vote shortly.
On 2022/01/14 02:18:03 Dehowe F wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about
+1
I checked the following:
- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
Best regards,
Eya
On 2022/01/14 02:18:03 Dehowe F wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release
+1
All links are valid
verified the signature
verified the hash
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:56 AM John Gemignani
wrote:
> +1
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:57 AM Joe Fagan wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2022/01/14 02:18:03 Dehowe F wrote:
> > > Dear Apache Community,
> > >
> > > We would
+1
John
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:57 AM Joe Fagan wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/14 02:18:03 Dehowe F wrote:
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> > working toward it.
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see
+1
On 2022/01/14 02:18:03 Dehowe F wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
>
Dear Apache Community,
We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
working toward it.
To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
*Add VLE core to the MATCH clause.
*Added support for
