I have reviewed and approved it.
It just needs another,...
john
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 7:55 AM Muhammad Taha wrote:
> Sure. I have created the PR https://github.com/apache/age/pull/2171
>
> On 2025/05/10 15:43:06 John Gemignani wrote:
> > Could you create a PR for that Taha?
> >
> > Additiona
Sure. I have created the PR https://github.com/apache/age/pull/2171
On 2025/05/10 15:43:06 John Gemignani wrote:
> Could you create a PR for that Taha?
>
> Additionally, could you add to that PR a decrease of 1, from 2, of the
> required number of committer reviews for PRs?
>
> John
>
> On Sat,
Could you create a PR for that Taha?
Additionally, could you add to that PR a decrease of 1, from 2, of the
required number of committer reviews for PRs?
John
On Sat, May 10, 2025, 8:32 AM Muhammad Taha wrote:
> Agreed. Given the limited availability of contributors, auto-closing feels
> unnec
Agreed. Given the limited availability of contributors, auto-closing feels
unnecessary.
On 2025/05/02 03:41:36 Rafsun Masud wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> What do you think about disabling the GitHub bot that auto-closes issues? I
> think it is too fast to auto-close an issue after 14 days of inactivit
I am okay with it being increased or disabled.
Remember, it was originally added due to the sheer number of issues created
and then abandoned by their creators.
As this is less of an issue now, it does feel unnecessary.
John
On Thu, May 1, 2025, 9:18 PM Umar Hayat wrote:
> Hi Rafsun,
> Agree.
Hi Rafsun,
Agree.
In my opinion It should be disabled for now until we have sufficient
engagement for committers.
Regards,
Umar Hayat
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 12:41 PM Rafsun Masud wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> What do you think about disabling the GitHub bot that auto-closes issues? I
> think it is t
