Build fails in gfac-bes with a fresh m2 repo

2014-10-20 Thread Lahiru Gunathilake
[INFO] Airavata GFac GRAM implementation .. SUCCESS [ 0.713 s] [INFO] Airavata GFac BES implementation ... FAILURE [ 1.917 s] [INFO] Airavata Security Implementation ... SKIPPED [INFO] Airavata Credential Store Service .. SKIPPED

Re: Evaluate Suitable Scientific Workflow Language for Airavata.

2014-10-20 Thread Amila Jayasekara
Hello, I am sorry, I am bit late on this thread. But when reading through this thread I simply got lost, what this thread is discussing. I have few questions. 1. @Shameera : Is XWF actually a language to define workflow ? To my understanding it was an intermediate representation to convert

Re: Evaluate Suitable Scientific Workflow Language for Airavata.

2014-10-20 Thread Shameera Rathnayaka
Hi Amila, Please see my comments inline. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Amila Jayasekara thejaka.am...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am sorry, I am bit late on this thread. But when reading through this thread I simply got lost, what this thread is discussing. I have few questions. 1.

Re: Evaluate Suitable Scientific Workflow Language for Airavata.

2014-10-20 Thread Lahiru Gunathilake
Hi Shameera, I think the whole point of introducing thrift is to support language bindings for gateway developers and I do not think we should limit this freedom by introducing a python client just to build a workflow. I propose to represent a workflow as a thrift data-structure (I think by using

Re: Evaluate Suitable Scientific Workflow Language for Airavata.

2014-10-20 Thread Amila Jayasekara
Hi Shameera, Thanks for the reply. I wouldnt call XWF a language. It is not a language in any sense but an intermediate representation of a workflow graph. To my understanding what you need is not a language but an efficient portable intermediate representation. Seems you also have realized it.