Thanks Ash and everyone who was involved!
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:16 PM Kevin Yang wrote:
> Releases keeps getting smoothier And definitely looking forwards to have
> DAG serialization, or maybe even stateless webserver?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin Y
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:49 PM Jarek
Tomasz and Ash got good points about the overhead of having separate repos.
But while we grow bigger and more mature, I would prefer to have what was
described in AIP-8. It shouldn't be extremely hard for us to come up with
good strategies to handle the overhead. AIP-8 already talked about how it
Make sense. Would probably prefer weekends 2 months back. Maybe half-half
then?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:59 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Well. Seems like some of us have more time to spend on Airflow during the
> weekends rather than weekdays so I think it's OK to get the voting covering
> both -
Releases keeps getting smoothier And definitely looking forwards to have
DAG serialization, or maybe even stateless webserver?
Cheers,
Kevin Y
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:49 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Great! So now we can now target our efforts towards 1.10.7 with long
> awaited DAG
Well. Seems like some of us have more time to spend on Airflow during the
weekends rather than weekdays so I think it's OK to get the voting covering
both - week-ends and week-days ;)
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:51 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> :) Given this was no-code-changes since RC1 I
:) Given this was no-code-changes since RC1 I wasn't worrying about it on this
specific vote, but yes point taken :)
-ash
> On 28 Oct 2019, at 21:49, Kevin Yang wrote:
>
>
>
> Tested core, UI and breeze locally with 3.7.3, all good. +1 (non-binding)
> Maybe next time make the voting hours
Fantastic!
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:18 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache Airflow 1.10.6 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
>
> 4 “+1” binding votes received:
> - Ash Berlin-Taylor (binding)
> - Kaxil Naik (binding)
> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> - Jarek Potiuk (binding)
>
> No
Tested core, UI and breeze locally with 3.7.3, all good. +1 (non-binding)
Maybe next time make the voting hours all in weekdays? :P
Cheers,
Kevin Y
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:18 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache Airflow 1.10.6 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
>
> 4 “+1”
Great! So now we can now target our efforts towards 1.10.7 with long
awaited DAG serialisation ! And work on 2.0* in parallel. Exciting times :)
J,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:43 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> Dear Airflow community,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Airflow 1.10.6 was just
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 1.10.6 was just released.
The source release, as well as the binary "sdist" and wheel bundles, are
available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/1.10.6/
We also made this version available on PyPi for
Hello,
Apache Airflow 1.10.6 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
4 “+1” binding votes received:
- Ash Berlin-Taylor (binding)
- Kaxil Naik (binding)
- Fokko Driesprong (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
No other votes were cast.
I'll continue with the release process and the release
We are checking how we can use namespaces in back-portable way and we will
have POC soon so that we all will be able to see how it will look like.
J.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> I'll have to read your proposal in detail (sorry, no time right now!), but
> I'm
I'll have to read your proposal in detail (sorry, no time right now!), but I'm
broadly in favour of this approach, and I think keeping them _in_ the same repo
is the best plan -- that makes writing and testing cross-cutting changes
easier.
-a
> On 28 Oct 2019, at 12:14, Tomasz Urbaszek
I think utilizing namespaces should reduce a lot of problems raised by
using separate repos (who will manage it? how to release? where should be
the repo?).
Bests,
Tomek
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 11:54 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Thanks Bas for comments! Let me share my thoughts below.
>
> On Sun,
14 matches
Mail list logo
