Verified signatures, licenses, checksums.
+1 (binding)
do want to mention though that it looks like yandex and jdbc release notes
still both mention 4.0 (which was an accident related to recent change in
policy re major bump for min airflow version bump) but i defer to your
judgment whether
+1 non binding. Tested for the RC versions below and they worked as
expected.
"apache-airflow-providers-amazon==6.1.0rc1,
apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive==4.1.0rc1,
apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy==3.2.0rc1,
apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.3.0rc1,
One more needed :)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:34 AM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
>
> +1 binding
> Checked files, licenses, and signatures
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 18:45, Pankaj Singh wrote:
>>
>> +1 non-binding
>>
>> Tested my changes related to amazon and google provider worked as expected.
>>
>>
+1 binding
Checked files, licenses, and signatures
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 18:45, Pankaj Singh wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Tested my changes related to amazon and google provider worked as
> expected.
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:03 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>> Would love some votes - we have a
+1 non-binding
I love how easy it is for me to plug my own requirement in Airflow without
touching the core Airflow. This would definitely be a great improvement.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:54 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 binding
> This would be a great improvement!
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at
+1 non-binding
Tested my changes related to amazon and google provider worked as expected.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:03 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Would love some votes - we have a follow up release after a few small
> providers docs/fixes, so would be great to release it before tomorrow
> and
Would love some votes - we have a follow up release after a few small
providers docs/fixes, so would be great to release it before tomorrow
and start the follow up right after :)
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers
+1 binding
This would be a great improvement!
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:32 AM Robert Karish
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Looks like a great improvement!
>
> Best,
> Robert
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Ping Zhang wrote:
>
>> +1 binding.
>>
>> Thanks for proposing this work. It will
