A little side-track., small comment to what Shubham wrote
Yeah. I also noticed AIP-47 mentioned - but I considered that
implementation detail. I read that those will be rather regular unit
tests (so not reaching out to external systems as it makes little
sense and we definitely want to make open-l
Hi Elad,
Thanks for bringing this topic.
I also feel we should have some automation to close the stale issue.
Few questions I have
- We have currently more than 700 issues and many of them have had no
activity since a year. What will we do with those issues?
- Why close only stale issues not sta
+1 non-binding. I'll be on the lookout for initial PRs to learn more about the
implementation details of how System Tests will be extended to cover these
changes, as well as the ongoing maintenance required from providers. The
proposed changes should definitely make it easier for Airflow custome
Hi everyone,
It's been a while since we talked about the issue triage process. Currently
our process involves a lot of manual work of pinging issue authors and I'm
looking to automate some of it.
Here are my suggestions:
1. add a new bot automation to detect core bug issues (kind:bug, area:code)
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages were
just released.
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/7.2.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/4.2.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Jed Cunningham (binding)
6 "+1+ non-binding votes received:
- Pankaj Koti
- Oliveira Niko
- Rajath Srinivasaiah
- Pankaj Singh
- Phani Kumar
- Josh
I do not think we need more time than given by DB providers. I wonder
(and this is more of a guess - because I have no data to back it up)
extra time is not going to be used anyway. But I am not very strong on
that. As long as we have "a" policy and we communicate it clearly, I
am good.
Why do I t
+1 binding. Looked at the latest changes, my concerns were alleviated. I
think there are a few implementation details that might need clarifications
during implementation but overall i think it is a good move for the
community.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 8:42 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
>
> +1 bin
