You're not too late, and thanks for engaging with the issue.
I don't think anyone would dispute that users will sometimes want a setup
without a teardown. But the question is should we require that users
explicitly make the scope of a setup well-defined. Like Jarek, I have some
ambivalence on
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.6.3 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.6.3 (based on RC1) has been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Jarek Potiuk
- Jed Cunningham
- Pierre Jeambrun
- Ephraim Anierobi
6 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Hussein Awala
- Pankaj Koti
- Pankaj Singh
- Amogh Desai
- Rahul Vats
- Phani Kumar
Vote
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages were
just released.
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.3.0/
The source release, as well as the binary releases, are available here:
Vote is now closed.
Result vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/g1ckn7qc2f4fcntqrt8noj4whc2b86ow
Thank you everyone.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:35 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signatures, checksums, licences.
>
Hello,
Apache Airflow Amazon Provider (based on RC4) have been accepted.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Kaxil Naik (binding)
- Jed Cunningham (binding)
6 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Hussein Awala
- Pankaj Koti
- Wei Lee
- Pankaj Singh
-
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, licences.
+1 (binding). Signatures, licences, checksums and artifacts vs tags look
good. Also used it to run a few sample dags and played around with the UI.
Le lun. 10 juil. 2023 à 17:59, Phani Kumar
a écrit :
> +1 non-binding. Ran some example DAGs and verified that they ran
> successfully
>
> On Mon,
+1 non-binding. Ran some example DAGs and verified that they ran
successfully
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:23 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signatures, checksums, licences, and compared code to the tag. Used
> it with the helm chart with a few different config.
>
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, licences, and compared code to the tag. Used
it with the helm chart with a few different config.
+1 (non binding) tested few example dags.
Best regards,
Akash
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, 19:40 Vincent Beck, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). I ran successfully my testing DAGs from Amazon provider
> package
>
> On 2023/07/10 10:17:29 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> > +1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences,
+1 (non-binding). I ran successfully my testing DAGs from Amazon provider
package
On 2023/07/10 10:17:29 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences, checksums, compared the
> sources with the ones in the repository (both in whl and sdist).
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:28
+1 (non-binding)
Below are the list of item I have tested:
- Example DAGS with Celery and k8s executor in RC.
- Verified providers Integration example DAGs with Celery and k8s executor
in RC.
- Retested some of bug fixes
- Did a quick UI sanity
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Mon, 10
+1 (non binding)
Started airflow successfully and tested out dags I've been working on
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 17:39 Pankaj Singh wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> ran some example dags and checked some UI behaviour in the airflow docker
> rc image.
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at
+ 1 (non-binding)
ran some example dags and checked some UI behaviour in the airflow docker
rc image.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:03 PM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Used this RC to start Airflow with breeze and ran a few example DAGs.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior
+1 (non-binding)
Used this RC to start Airflow with breeze and ran a few example DAGs.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Jul
+1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences, checksums, compared the
sources with the ones in the repository (both in whl and sdist).
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:28 AM Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> tested my changes
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Wei Lee wrote:
>
> > +1
+1 (non-binding)
tested my changes
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested without example amazon DAGs without encountering issues.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
>
> > On Jul 10, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Our Amazon
+1 (non-binding)
Tested without example amazon DAGs without encountering issues.
Best,
Wei
> On Jul 10, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Our Amazon example DAGs ran fine with this RC.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS
+1 (non-binding)
Our Amazon example DAGs ran fine with this RC.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 1:08 AM
20 matches
Mail list logo
