Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic operators (users shooting themselves in their foot)

2024-03-02 Thread Daniel Standish
One wrinkle to the have cake and eat it too approach is deferrable operators. It doesn't seem it would be very practical to resume back into the operator that is nested inside a taskflow function. One solution would be to run the trigger in process like we currently do with `dag.test()`. That

Re: Bad mixing of decorated and classic operators (users shooting themselves in their foot)

2024-03-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I guess PR to propose something for that would be a good start :). I I am fine - for now with forbidding it "as-is" and then maybe next step once we do it is to figure out a nicer way of doing it than Hooks. Maybe it can be done in parallel. On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:19 PM Blain David wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.13.0 based on 1.13.0rc1

2024-03-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding): verified reproducibility (yay - works nicely finally !), signatures, checksums, licences. Installed Airflow 2.8.2 in kind cluster using the "rc1" - published chart., played a bit with it - ran a few DAGs using Breeze - using the same version as released in the Helm Chart - all looks