+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences - >
all good. Installed it, run a few dags, clicked through a number of
screens. All looks good. Also verified the final package and it looks good
with the right FAB >=1.0.2 dependency. All looks good.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at
Interested in seeing the difference, +1
- ferruzzi
From: Oliveira, Niko
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 2:00 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Consider disabling
self-hosted runners for commiter PRs
CAUTION:
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.9.0rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last at least 52 hours, from Thursday, April 4, 2024, at 9:00 pm
UTC
until Sunday, April 7, 2024, at 1:00 am UTC
+1I'd love to see this as well.
In the past, stability and long queue times of PR builds have been very
frustrating. I'm not 100% sure this is due to using self hosted runners, since
35 queue depth (to my mind) should be plenty. But something about that setup
has never seemed quite right to me
+1 from me to this idea.
Sounds very reasonable to me.
At times, my experience has been better with public runners instead of
self-hosted runners :)
And like already mentioned in the discussion, I think having the ability of
a applying the label "use-self-hosted-runners" to be used for critical
Hello everyone,
TL;DR With some recent changes in GitHub Actions and the fact that ASF has
a lot of runners available donated for all the builds, I think we could
experiment with disabling "self-hosted" runners for committer builds.
The self-hosted runners of ours have been extremely helpful
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I'm canceling this vote due to the above bug report and will create an RC2
soon.
- Ephraim
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 11:49, Rahul Vats wrote:
> I am getting below traceback in migration pod when trying to downgrade.
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
Hello,
The vote for AIP-62 has completed and it has been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Maciej Obuchowski
- Jarek Potiuk
- Phani Kumar
- Pankaj Koti
3 "+1" non-binding received:
- Jakub Dardziński
- Abhishek Bhakat
- Ankit Chaurasia
Vote thread:
+1 (non-binding).
Regards,
Ankit Chaurasia
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:44 PM Abhishek Bhakat
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Avi
>
> > On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:23, Pankaj Koti
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding. Sounds exciting.
> >
> > Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Avi
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:23, Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding. Sounds exciting.
>
> Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some questions but those are
> implementation related
> and I think the PRs will help me understand those :)
>
>
> Best regards,
I am getting below traceback in migration pod when trying to downgrade.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/airflow", line 8, in
sys.exit(main())
^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/airflow/__main__.py", line
58, in main
> I am unable to downgrade from version 2.9.0rc1 to 2.8.4 after upgrading.
Could you provide more information about the problem?
On Thursday, April 4, 2024, Rahul Vats wrote:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> I am unable to downgrade from version 2.9.0rc1 to 2.8.4 after upgrading.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul
-1 (non-binding)
I am unable to downgrade from version 2.9.0rc1 to 2.8.4 after upgrading.
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 13:55, Amogh Desai wrote:
> Btw, these links are wrong. Instead refer this:
>
> 1. For PMC:
>
>
+1 binding. Sounds exciting.
Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some questions but those are
implementation related
and I think the PRs will help me understand those :)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra,
+1 binding. Looking forward to this
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:06 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +0.9 (binding) I like the idea of this AIP, but I have not followed the
> entire implementation of AIP-53 to understand the need for the proposed
> implementation and discuss it, but I look forward to
Btw, these links are wrong. Instead refer this:
1. For PMC:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
2. For contributors:
16 matches
Mail list logo