+1 (binding)
On Thursday, April 18, 2024, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding): checked reproducibility, licences, signatures, checksums -
> all look good.
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:27 PM Pankaj Singh
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) tested my changes.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Pankaj
> >
> >
> >
>
A wonderful and exciting Saturday morning discussion!
Thank you Jarek for bringing the offline conversations into the mailing
list.
I completely agree on the necessity of Airflow 3.
I also agree that Gen AI is the trigger i.e. the answer to "Why now"?
Having been thinking about this for a while
Hey Jens,
I looked at the AIPs when you created them and I very much like the
directions put there - but it also got me into a lot of thinking on the
future of Airflow and AIPs. See the thread I started
https://lists.apache.org/thread/3chvg9964zvh15mtrbl073f4oj3nlzp2 - about
Airflow 3.
I think
Hey Ash and Daniel (and others unconvinced),
I split the discussion here so that we do not clutter the VOTE thread.
I hope I can convince you that yes, it makes sense to approach it this way
and that you withdraw the veto Ash. It needs a bit of context and the
separate discussion I started on
Hello here,
I have been thinking a lot recently and discussing with some people and I
am more and more convinced it's about the time we - as a community - should
start doing changes considering "Airflow 2" current and "Airflow 3" future.
*TL;DR: I think we should seriously start work on Airflow
