Re: [DISCUSS] DRAFT AIP-68 Extended Plugin Interface + AIP-69 Remote Executor

2024-04-23 Thread Brent Bovenzi
I like AIP-68. I have been thinking about the exact same thing. I think it can fit into either 2.x or 3.0. Before we take it out of draft I need to play with plugins more to get a good sense of how to actually implement it. On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:38 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Good work on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc1

2024-04-23 Thread Pankaj Koti
+1 (non-binding) Tested the RC client to do some basic functionalities like get DAGs, tasks for a DAG, trigger a DAG, get Airflow configuration. Everything went well! Best regards, *Pankaj Koti* Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India Timezone:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc1

2024-04-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding): tested reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences (code is autogenerated), run some basic tests with Airflow 2.9.0 with the RC1 client On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:05 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut the first release candidate for the Apache