Just to make it clear I marked this PR as Draft - and I would really
appreciate some comments about the approach and direction (in the light of
Connexion 2 being dead-end holding us from security-related upgrades and
generally holding us back).
Surely - there are things to be improved in this PR,
I don't think AIP is needed (because it's not really a user facing change
and generally the change is backwards compatible.
But yeah - the call for help is mostly to see / review / discuss it when we
really know the scope of the change after we have a PR that proves that yes
- it can be done.
It
Does the scope of this PR warrant an AIP?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 6:40 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello here,
>
> I have a kind request for help from maintainers (and other contributors who
> are not maintainers) - on the Connexion 3 migration for Airflow. PR here
> (unfortunately - it's one big
Hello here,
I have a kind request for help from maintainers (and other contributors who
are not maintainers) - on the Connexion 3 migration for Airflow. PR here
(unfortunately - it's one big PR and cannot be split):
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39055.
I would love some general comments
