Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-11-06 Thread Jarek Potiuk
vote to get rid of them. > > Cheers, > Niko > -- > *From:* Jarek Potiuk > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2022 5:26:13 AM > *To:* dev@airflow.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: [EXTERNAL][PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role > including strengh

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-31 Thread Oliveira, Niko
be happy to vote to get rid of them. Cheers, Niko From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 5:26:13 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active tri

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-29 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Thanks to everyone who added their comments in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27262 - a lot of the comments were super valuable and helpful and I re-worked the description a bit based on them so you might want to take another look. I've modified and extended the description a bit to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-27 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I got some good feedback on the wording. Anyone else would like to chime in? https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27262 J. On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:51 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > BTW. I spoke To Andrey (AKA @Taragolis) and I think (and Andrey agrees) he > would be a great member of the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-25 Thread Jarek Potiuk
BTW. I spoke To Andrey (AKA @Taragolis) and I think (and Andrey agrees) he would be a great member of the Triage team. PR: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27278 On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:04 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Losing these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-25 Thread Jarek Potiuk
> Losing these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because we > lost perhaps a great future contributor/committer/triager. Cannot agree more - that this is what I would really like to avoid ! Pretty much Every time we lose someone passionate who loves our product and would be a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-25 Thread Daniel Standish
> > 3. I am also getting a true sense of just how overwhelming the influx of > Issues, PRs and Discussions is. I have come across several folks who > submitted PRs and never got feedback and then left the community. Losing > these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because we lost

Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-25 Thread Oliveira, Niko
into this side of Airflow; it's tedious and time consuming work, and is often under appreciated! Cheers, Niko From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 6:50 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role

[PROPOSAL] Clarifications of triage team role including strenghtening importance of active triaging

2022-10-25 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey everyone, I think with the recent addition of Denis and Niko to the triage team we already see some good signs that we should likely make the triage team stronger and also incentivised to help :). I think this is instrumental to be more welcoming for our community to respond quicker to