Hey folks!
The voting for AIP-51 Removing Executor Coupling from Core Airlfow
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-51+Removing+Executor+Coupling+from+Core+Airlfow)
was completed on November 21, 2022, and I am happy announce the following
voting result:
*Binding (+6)
+1 non-binding
I love how easy it is for me to plug my own requirement in Airflow without
touching the core Airflow. This would definitely be a great improvement.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:54 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 binding
> This would be a great improvement!
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at
+1 binding
This would be a great improvement!
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:32 AM Robert Karish
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Looks like a great improvement!
>
> Best,
> Robert
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Ping Zhang wrote:
>
>> +1 binding.
>>
>> Thanks for proposing this work. It will
+1 (non-binding)
Looks like a great improvement!
Best,
Robert
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Ping Zhang wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> Thanks for proposing this work. It will lead to a cleaner interface.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ping
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
> wrote:
>
>> Hey
+1 binding.
Thanks for proposing this work. It will lead to a cleaner interface.
Thanks,
Ping
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling
> from Core Airlfow".
>
> You can find the AIP here:
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
This would be a great improvement.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:24 AM Igor Kholopov
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 6:27 PM Darren Weber
> wrote:
>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> This turned out to be a sticking point while considering AIP-28 (replaced
>> by AIP-40)
>>
>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 6:27 PM Darren Weber
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> This turned out to be a sticking point while considering AIP-28 (replaced
> by AIP-40)
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:44 AM Xiaodong Deng wrote:
>
>> Just read through the AIP. It reads nice & solid
>>
>> +1
+1
This turned out to be a sticking point while considering AIP-28 (replaced
by AIP-40)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:44 AM Xiaodong Deng wrote:
> Just read through the AIP. It reads nice & solid
>
> +1 binding.
>
>
> XD
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:16 AM Tomasz Urbaszek
> wrote:
>
>> +1
Just read through the AIP. It reads nice & solid
+1 binding.
XD
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:16 AM Tomasz Urbaszek
wrote:
> +1 binding. I personally added some of the coupling ifs
>
> T.
>
+1 binding. I personally added some of the coupling ifs
T.
+1 (binding)
On Wed 16 Nov 2022 at 03:20, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling
> from Core Airlfow".
> >
> > You can find the AIP here:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from
> Core Airlfow".
>
> You can find the AIP here:
>
Hey folks!
I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from Core
Airlfow".
You can find the AIP here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-51+Removing+Executor+Coupling+from+Core+Airlfow
Discussion threads:
13 matches
Mail list logo
