Hello,
The vote for AIP-62 has completed and it has been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Maciej Obuchowski
- Jarek Potiuk
- Phani Kumar
- Pankaj Koti
3 "+1" non-binding received:
- Jakub Dardziński
- Abhishek Bhakat
- Ankit Chaurasia
Vote thread:
+1 (non-binding).
Regards,
Ankit Chaurasia
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:44 PM Abhishek Bhakat
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Avi
>
> > On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:23, Pankaj Koti
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding. Sounds exciting.
> >
> > Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Avi
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:23, Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding. Sounds exciting.
>
> Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some questions but those are
> implementation related
> and I think the PRs will help me understand those :)
>
>
> Best regards,
+1 binding. Sounds exciting.
Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some questions but those are
implementation related
and I think the PRs will help me understand those :)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra,
+1 binding. Looking forward to this
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:06 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +0.9 (binding) I like the idea of this AIP, but I have not followed the
> entire implementation of AIP-53 to understand the need for the proposed
> implementation and discuss it, but I look forward to
+0.9 (binding) I like the idea of this AIP, but I have not followed the
entire implementation of AIP-53 to understand the need for the proposed
implementation and discuss it, but I look forward to seeing it in Airflow.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:23 PM Jakub Dardziński wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
+1 (non-binding). It will enable long-awaited enriched support for
PythonOperator
pt., 29 mar 2024 o 22:23 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a):
> +1 (binding). I think that's a really important missing piece in lineage
> integration.
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47 PM Maciej Obuchowski >
> wrote:
>
> >
+1 (binding). I think that's a really important missing piece in lineage
integration.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47 PM Maciej Obuchowski
wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to start a vote on AIP-62: Getting Lineage from Hook
> Instrumentation, to be implemented into (presumably) Airflow 2.10.
>
>
Hello,
I would like to start a vote on AIP-62: Getting Lineage from Hook
Instrumentation, to be implemented into (presumably) Airflow 2.10.
The AIP can be found here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-62+Getting+Lineage+from+Hook+Instrumentation
Discussion Thread:
