Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-15 Thread Ankit Chaurasia
-1 (non-binding) for Pinecone I see example_pinecone_cohere is still failing in 2.0.0rc2. I am looking into this. Ankit Chaurasia Ankit Chaurasia HomePage | LinkedIn | +91-9987351649 On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:20 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > > +1 non binding. All AWS system tests are

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-14 Thread Vincent Beck
+1 non binding. All AWS system tests are running fine against apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.22.0rc1. You can see the results here: https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/1e4663f34c2fb42b87cf75e4776650620eb2baa4_8.22.0rc1.html On 2024/05/14 08:21:12 Phani Kumar wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-14 Thread Phani Kumar
+1 non-binding - verified that our example DAGs using amazon, google and Azure providers are running fine On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:30 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding - verified sigs & checksums > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 08:00, Utkarsh Sharma > wrote: > > > Verified Amazon provider changes,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 binding - verified sigs & checksums On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 08:00, Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > Verified Amazon provider changes, working as expected. > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Rahul Vats > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding ) for Amazon, google, and azure

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-14 Thread Utkarsh Sharma
Verified Amazon provider changes, working as expected. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding ) for Amazon, google, and azure verified our example dags > worked fine. > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 09:45,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-13 Thread Rahul Vats
+1 (non-binding ) for Amazon, google, and azure verified our example dags worked fine. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 09:45, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Test a few examples DAGs with Amazon, google, and azure providers without > encountering issues. > > Best,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-13 Thread Wei Lee
+1 (non-binding) Test a few examples DAGs with Amazon, google, and azure providers without encountering issues. Best, Wei > On May 13, 2024, at 9:44 PM, Hussein Awala wrote: > > +1 (binding): checked the licences, the signatures, the checksums, and ran > some testing dags for Amazon

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-13 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding): checked the licences, the signatures, the checksums, and ran some testing dags for Amazon provider. On Monday, May 13, 2024, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): verified reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:34 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-13 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding): verified reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:34 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

2024-05-12 Thread Elad Kalif
Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on May 15, 2024 19:30 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Airflow