I can speak/attend if its in bangalore
On Tue 21 Aug, 2018, 12:09 Sumit Maheshwari, wrote:
> Hi Raman,
>
> Folks from Qubole certainly join/talk if the meetup is happening in
> Bangalore. However, sometime back I did a poll about the same and got only
> 7 responses, so have dropped the idea of
Thanks Sumit,
We work for Adobe and will try to have it in bangalore based on the
participation.
Would it be possible for you to share the poll link.
Thanks,
Raman Gupta
On 2018/08/21 06:38:37, Sumit Maheshwari wrote:
> Hi Raman,
>
> Folks from Qubole certainly join/talk if the meetup is
Hi Raman,
Folks from Qubole certainly join/talk if the meetup is happening in
Bangalore. However, sometime back I did a poll about the same and got only
7 responses, so have dropped the idea of conducting.
Let us know if you get enough traction this time.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at
Sure, here it is https://goo.gl/forms/2NF6HtUwpOOTvi373
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM ramandu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Thanks Sumit,
> We work for Adobe and will try to have it in bangalore based on the
> participation.
> Would it be possible for you to share the poll link.
>
> Thanks,
> Raman
Forms says preferred month is may, june or july. Is the form outdated?
On Tue 21 Aug, 2018, 17:43 Sumit Maheshwari, wrote:
> Sure, here it is https://goo.gl/forms/2NF6HtUwpOOTvi373
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM ramandu...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Sumit,
> > We work for Adobe and
Yes, the poll was conducted around March end.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:49 PM Sai Phanindhra wrote:
> Forms says preferred month is may, june or july. Is the form outdated?
>
> On Tue 21 Aug, 2018, 17:43 Sumit Maheshwari,
> wrote:
>
> > Sure, here it is https://goo.gl/forms/2NF6HtUwpOOTvi373
Is there any possibility that on call of function
_check_and_change_state_before_execution at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/v1-9-stable/airflow/jobs.py#L2500,
this method is not actually being called
Does the meet up need some minimum number of responses ?? If so, I'm also ready
to attend it
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 18:01, Sumit Maheshwari wrote:
Yes, the poll was conducted around March end.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:49 PM Sai Phanindhra wrote:
>
Sumit, can you update the form? It still shows past months. Add future
months where we can plan a airflow meetup.
On Tue 21 Aug, 2018, 18:01 Sumit Maheshwari, wrote:
> Yes, the poll was conducted around March end.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:49 PM Sai Phanindhra
> wrote:
>
> > Forms says
We're currently using CeleryExecutor ...
On 21/08/2018, 15:12, "Driesprong, Fokko" wrote:
Hi Aleksander,
What kind of executor are you using? This is really important when choosing
a strategy. For most of the Airflow deployments that I've worked with
simply uses git to deploy
Hi All,
As per http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/core/connections.html link db
engine is not portable across process boundaries
"For a multiple-process application that uses the os.fork system call, or for
example the Python multiprocessing module, it’s usually required that a
separate
I can, what's your PyPI ID?
Max
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
> Thanks Bolke!
>
> I've just pushed the artifacts to Apache Dist:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/1.10.0-incubating/
>
> I don't have any access to pypi, this means that
One possibility is the unavailability of session while calling
self.task_instance._check_and_change_state_before_execution
function.
(Session is provided via @provide_session decorator)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:09 PM vardangupta...@gmail.com <
vardangupta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any
@Vaibhav, I guess if there are atleast 20 or plus people are interested,
then only it makes sense to conduct a meetup.
@Sai, have updated the form.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:31 PM Sai Phanindhra wrote:
> Sumit, can you update the form? It still shows past months. Add future
> months where we
Hi Hemanth,
Thanks for the question. There is the KubernetesExecutor which just uses a
container with Airflow to schedule a task on the kubernetes cluster. This
container will then execute a single task, and then the Executor checks the
exitcode of the container.
There is also the
We follow the strategy to re-build Docker with each deployment, because
sometimes DAG changes can include new or updated dependencies. This
Docker-first approach makes local development nice too (run same
Docker images on local machine during debug as production). This isnt
painful for us because
Hi all,
in the place I'm currently at we're building and redeploying a new set of
containers with the latest code every time we want to update a DAG. That
doesn't feel like the fastest way.
Anyone can share their approach?
Thanks,
Aleksander
Hi Team,
Does Kubernetes executor in 1.10 create new pod for every task ? (Which means
won’t there be any active workers running except for new Tasks)
We are trying to containerize our existing to airflow environment, your reply
Will help us to understand it more.
Thanks in Advance .
Thanks
Hi Aleksander,
What kind of executor are you using? This is really important when choosing
a strategy. For most of the Airflow deployments that I've worked with
simply uses git to deploy the master branch. This is with a LocalExecutor.
Cheers, Fokko
Op di 21 aug. 2018 om 15:25 schreef Dev
We're currently using CeleryExecutor
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> What kind of executor are you using? This is really important when choosing
> a strategy. For most of the Airflow deployments that I've worked with
> simply uses git to deploy the
20 matches
Mail list logo
