DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20014.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Costin,
I will reply to these e-mails separately, if this is ok.
On Saturday 17 May 2003 19:59, Costin Manolache wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, I had almost no acces to internet ( or time )
last week.
My main concern is the same as Conor's - having this decoupled and done
in few steps.
On Saturday 17 May 2003 20:13, Costin Manolache wrote:
peter reilly wrote:
for example:
typedef resource=org/acme/mydefinitions.xml classpath=classes/
to allow loading of tasks/types from different 3rd party with some tasks
haveing the same name, I have added a prefix attribute.
From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 17 May 2003 19:59, Costin Manolache wrote:
I think taskdef should be treated as a special typedef
with TaskAdapter
as adapter.
( i.e. use typedef as the main definition mechanism, and
taskdef as
a shortcut for types with
On Saturday 17 May 2003 20:16, Costin Manolache wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I am having a look at
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897
This proposal seems to address most of the points discussed in this
mailing list concerning the antlib thread of discussion.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17640.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/05/19 05:18:10
Modified:.WHATSNEW build.xml
docs/manual/CoreTasks apply.html chmod.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java
ExecuteOn.java
Log:
You can now limit the parallelism of apply and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13654.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15929.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17640.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19883.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Frank A. Hunleth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem that I ran into was that I was running a program using
the apply task. It ran faster if given many files to work on in
parallel, but in one situation the number of files passed to it
overwhelmned it.
Thanks, the patch
On Monday 19 May 2003 11:50, Wannheden, Knut wrote:
Peter,
acme:hellp xmlns:acme=NSURI
This would allow arbitrary NSURIs ( for people who like
meaning-free URIs)
and allow the classpath association.
I do not want meaning-free URIs.
I want ant to ignore URIs that it
bodewig 2003/05/19 07:05:23
Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs move.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MoveTest.java
Log:
Demonstrate bug 11732
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +21 -0 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/move.xml
Index:
bodewig 2003/05/19 07:11:24
Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs move.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MoveTest.java
Log:
Demonstrate bug 18886
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +9 -0 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/move.xml
Index:
bodewig 2003/05/19 07:27:43
Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs move.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MoveTest.java
Log:
Actually, the test for 18886 was supposed to work as is, this is a better test
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +9 -0
From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 19 May 2003 11:50, Wannheden, Knut wrote:
I don't quite see why it would be impossible to have
meaning-free URIs.
Nothing is impossible..., but it is difficult to have
meaning-free URIs and to
support (as in ignore) other
bodewig 2003/05/19 07:43:17
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java Move.java
Log:
Don't remove basedirectories of filesets that just happen to be
matched completely.
PR: 18886
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +3 -2
On 19 May 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't remove basedirectories of filesets that just happen to be
matched completely.
This introduces a backwards incompatibility and maybe even
inconsistency, that's why I haven't closed the bug report yet. I'm
asking for feedback here.
The bug
bodewig 2003/05/19 08:21:15
Modified:.build.xml
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java Move.java
Log:
Remove directories explicitly matched with includes.
PR: 11732
Revision ChangesPath
1.379 +0 -1 ant/build.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/05/19 08:37:31
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks copy.html move.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java
Log:
Make copy's failonerror attribute swallow exception while copying as
well.
PR: 12999
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12999.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/05/19 08:41:23
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java
Log:
revert funny reformatting accidentially introduced with last commit
Revision ChangesPath
1.59 +50 -50ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Copy.java
Index:
bodewig 2003/05/19 08:55:23
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java
Log:
removeLeadingPath didn't work as expected when trying to remove a path
from itself.
PR: 19979
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yikes!!
There are a number of issues here.
1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary
URIs for ant type definitions?
I do not think this is a good idea.
2) what should ant do with URIs that it does not recognize?
a) use current method - unknown elements
b) ignore
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19288.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This is not an Ant-specific question, but I'm not aware of any general
build/deploy/promotion practices e-mail lists, and this is the closest
thing to that. If
someone does know of such a list/newsgroup, let me know and I redirect
my query
as appropriate.
Our current deployment for J2EE apps
31 matches
Mail list logo