DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] New: - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21386] New: - Project.fireMessageLoggedEvent susceptable to incorrect state

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AW: [Fwd: XSLT task question]

On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But there is a problem: > In which order the XSL files will be processed? > I would be careful using filesets for specifying the xsl files. In our case the order doesn't matter. I can't really think of a case where ordering would be an iss

Re: Help me Junit + Ant, please

You might want to check your imports. I notice that the class loader is looking for : siace/teste/junit/framework/TestCase The default TestCase class from junit should be in : junit.framework.TestCase Regards, John Liao "Aloizio Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/07/2003 05:57 PM Please respon

Help me Junit + Ant, please

- Original Message - From: Aloizio Silva To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 5:25 PM Subject: Help me Junit + Ant, please I am trying to run my unit test in the project, but it does not work. I have two directories. The first has the project classes (.class) and the sec

Help with JUnit + Ant

I am trying to run my unit test in the project, but it does not work. I have two directories. The first has the project classes (.class) and the second has the the project tests classes (.class). In this last directory I have one classe named Testador.class which is responsible for call all the tes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21320] - Copy task ignores all but first file returned by FileNameMapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21320] - Copy task ignores all but first file returned by FileNameMapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Patch] Upgrade WebLogic Jsp Compiler (WLJspc.java) to be compatible with WLS 6.1, 7.0, 8.1

Included in this patch is support for additional flags available to the jsp compiler in WebLogic 6.1, 7.0 and 8.1 This is actually more of a new file than a patch.   I tried sending the patch file, but the size was more than the limit allowed by this mailing list.  So here's just the source file.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21384] New: - vssget hanging

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21383] - FileUtilsTest.testToURI() failing when run from a drive other than C: (Win32 only)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21383] New: - FileUtilsTest.testToURI() failing when run from a drive other than C: (Win32 only)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Newbie contributor wannabe - WebLogic JSP Compiler

Also, the current WebLogic JSP Compiler only allow the following options: - classpath - packagename - webapp (aka src) - d (aka dest) I hope to provide support for all of the following options: -webapp Directory to be considered as the document

RE: Newbie contributor wannabe - WebLogic JSP Compiler

Well, from the Ant 1.5.3 online manual: "This works only on weblogic 4.5.1" Many of us have gone way past WebLogic 4.5.1. Seeing as this patch handles 6.1, 7.0, and 8.1, I would assume it would be desired by many. As to the process for submitting changes, please read http://jakarta.apache.or

Re: Newbie contributor wannabe - WebLogic JSP Compiler

The documentation mention that the current WebLogic JSP compiler is only tested up to version BEA WebLogic 4.5.1. The latest version of BEA WebLogic is 8.0 Regards, John Liao "Peter Nimmervoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/07/2003 03:37 PM Please respond to "Ant Developers List" To:

Re: Newbie contributor wannabe - WebLogic JSP Compiler

Hmm, what is the problem with the current WebLogic JSP Compiler Ant Task? On Monday 07 July 2003 21:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to contribute to the Ant project by providing an upgrade to > the existing WebLogic JSP Compiler > Ant Task. > > I have created an Ant Task for Weblogic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21373] - Multiple packages in CvsTagDiff causes StringIndexOutOfBounds

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Newbie contributor wannabe - WebLogic JSP Compiler

I would like to contribute to the Ant project by providing an upgrade to the existing WebLogic JSP Compiler Ant Task. I have created an Ant Task for Weblogic JSP Compiler and have done some prelimary tests for: - BEA WebLogic 6.1 SP3 on Windows 2000, RedHat 8.0, and Solaris 8 OS - BEA WebLogi

Re: [Patch] keep-alive feature

On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 18:12, Steve Loughran wrote: > peter reilly wrote: > > I am thinking of committing the keep-alive > > feature: > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21144 > > > > Do any of the ant commiters have a problem with > > this feature? > > > I am mostly neutra

Re: [Patch] keep-alive feature

peter reilly wrote: I am thinking of committing the keep-alive feature: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21144 Do any of the ant commiters have a problem with this feature? I am mostly neutral. I can see its value in some cases (install, but think that it may lead to grief down th

[Patch] keep-alive feature

I am thinking of committing the keep-alive feature: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21144 Do any of the ant commiters have a problem with this feature? Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18667] - javah module no longer works with Java 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21375] - Problem building Ant with JDK 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

peterreilly2003/07/07 07:54:00 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java Log: checkstyle changes Revision ChangesPath 1.143 +11 -10ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java Index: Project.java =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21375] New: - Problem building Ant with JDK 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Taskdef.java

peterreilly2003/07/07 07:40:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Taskdef.java Log: add comment Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +4 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Taskdef.java Index: Taskdef.java ==

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Concat.java

peterreilly2003/07/07 07:39:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Concat.java Log: Checkstyle changes Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +62 -28ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java Index: Concat.java ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14868] - Failed Building ANT Distribution !

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21373] - Multiple packages in CvsTagDiff causes StringIndexOutOfBounds

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21373] - Multiple packages in CvsTagDiff causes StringIndexOutOfBounds

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21373] New: - Multiple packages in CvsTagDiff causes StringIndexOutOfBounds

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Tiny patch to CvsTagDiff.java

Ok I will do. Thanks! Rory -Original Message- From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 July 2003 14:18 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Tiny patch to CvsTagDiff.java Hi Rory, I cannot get hold of your attachment in your email. Also, could you create a bug repor

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ClasspathUtils.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 06:57:29 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ClasspathUtils.java Log: Some whitespace changes Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +74 -71 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ClasspathUtils.java Index: ClasspathUtils.java ===

Re: Q: Double-expansion - reading environment variables "dynamically" ?

from the ant-contrib project at Sourceforge is what you want. Erik p.s. No need to get impatient after less than a day of posting to the user list, especially on a weekend. Not to mention that this has been answered numerous times on the list and the answer is surely in the archives

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/zip ZipFile.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 06:50:58 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/zip ZipFile.java Log: Make checkstyle a little happier. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +46 -18ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/zip/ZipFile.java Index: ZipFile.java =

Re: Tiny patch to CvsTagDiff.java

Hi Rory, I cannot get hold of your attachment in your email. Also, could you create a bug report in bugzilla with your patch attached to it. bugzilla is on http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla Cheers Antoine - Original Message - From: "Rory I. Sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.co

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Patch.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 06:05:03 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks patch.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Patch.java Log: Add destfile attribute to patch. Revision ChangesPath 1.453 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index:

Re: [Patch] new attribute "destfile" for core task "Patch"

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Stefan Seide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've a small update for the Patch task to allow Patch to write to > different output file names. Your patch didn't make it to the list, sorry. Please try the next nightly build of Ant (2003-07-08), I've added a destfile attribute to

Tiny patch to CvsTagDiff.java

Hi Forgive a wet-behind-the-ears newbie here, this is my first contrib. I have made a tiny patch to CvsTagDiff.java to support multiple packages. CVS itself happily accepts a space-separated list of packages/files to perform the rdiff command upon, but the Ant task (at least in 1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21365] New: - sql task trims newline with inline comments.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc JavaCC.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 02:08:44 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc JavaCC.java Log: Add support for JavaCC 3.1 Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +59 -30 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc/JavaCC.jav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Test Failures

On 07 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure that that depending on an undocumented (I think) > feature of Vector/Enumeration is a good idea. I agree, though it is sort-of documented in Vector's javadocs (the class description). , | The Iterators returned by Vecto

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Manifest.java

On 7 Jul 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't merge Class-Path attributes, deal with them like with any > other attribute This breaks backwards compatibility and has been recorded as such. I think the old behavior is a bug. I didn't implement a warning like "You manifest contains multip

Re: Test Failures

I think in general it is not a good idea. The code in question is: in Target#execute Iterator it = children.iterator(); Object o = it.next(); if (o instanceof Task) { Task task = (Task) o; task.perform();

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util CollectionUtils.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 01:20:52 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant RuntimeConfigurable.java Target.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util CollectionUtils.java Log: Move EmptyEnumeration to CollectionUtils Revision ChangesPath 1.39

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21170] - create jar may generate dumplicate (illegal) manifet entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Manifest.java

bodewig 2003/07/07 01:18:39 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Manifest.java Log: Don't merge Class-Path attributes, deal with them like with any other attribute - except that they may occur several times, that is. PR: 21170 R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21345] - javacc task to support javacc 3.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: PropertyHelper refactoring

On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, I'd like to make PropertyHelper abstract and create a > StandardPropertyHelper to implement the default behaviour. The > factory method can remain in the abstract class. The PropertyHelper > chaining could also stay +1 > and per

Re: Test Failures

On 04 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The test code in question was inserting tasks > into the current target, and this does not > seem to be a good idea. In general or just after the code change? If we agree that adding tasks to the current target is no good idea in general

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks starteam.html

bodewig 2003/07/07 00:34:59 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH starteam.html Log: Partial merge from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.13.2.3 +13 -2 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks starteam.html

bodewig 2003/07/07 00:24:53 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks starteam.html Log: Clarify documentation, PR 18007 Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +12 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/starteam.html Index: starteam.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18876] - signjar is incorrect to its documentation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu