DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18055] - javac task includes java rt.jar in classpath when using jvc compiler

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15230] - TAR long path names (GNU format) append a trailing 0 char

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Costin Manolache
Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is what import has to do with multiple

Re: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

2003-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Alex Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A fast scan ignores directories which can't possibly hold any included files/directories, but getExcludedFiles() says it doesn't care about these because it will never return them. The fast scan will also exclude directories that are

Re: csc and Mono (was Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml)

2003-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs. With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd vote for no refs. I was thinking of

RE: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

2003-08-07 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
I have never understood, why do we need getExcludedFiles() or getNotIncludedFiles(). What kind of tasks need this functionality? Jose Alberto -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2003 07:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

2003-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have never understood, why do we need getExcludedFiles() or getNotIncludedFiles(). What kind of tasks need this functionality? No built-in task does, but there are custom tasks that do. I once broke getNotIncludedFiles and

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java

2003-08-07 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/08/07 04:14:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarInputStream.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java Log: 2003 and missing license Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java

2003-08-07 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/08/07 04:17:17 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java Log: Add missing import Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -0 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar/TarRoundTripTest.java Index: TarRoundTripTest.java

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

2003-08-07 Thread Paul Nasrat
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO. The plan: Sounds good. The only changes over 1.5.3 will be the changes to javah and the VAJ tasks. Therefore I plan to explicitly state in the release notes as

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

2003-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please can the javacc fix go in too. I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to keep this release (and its process) as low level as possible. If we add the javacc changes, why not do the same for the VSS

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

2003-08-07 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: VAJ is in as the people who will benefit from the changes won't benefit from Ant 1.6 (as VAJ runs on a JDK 1.1 VM). Ah! Now I understand... +1 for the release - To

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

2003-08-07 Thread Paul Nasrat
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please can the javacc fix go in too. I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to keep this release (and its process) as low level as

[vms] case sensitivity and filesets

2003-08-07 Thread Knut Wannheden
The old native file system (ODS-2) on OpenVMS is completely case insensitive. A file will have all uppercase letters in the name and can be accessed using lowercase, uppercase, or mixed case. With the new ODS-5 file system this is a little bit different; I'd call it partially case sensitive.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] New: - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP] Build Failure - ant-testutil

2003-08-07 Thread Gump Integration Build
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-08-07/ant-testutil.html Buildfile: build.xml prepare: check_for_optional_packages: build:

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 4.43: Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Costin Manolache
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is what import

RE: PH2-provided import from proposal in 1.5 branch

2003-08-07 Thread Dominique Devienne
Anyone? Stefan? Why are all the proposals gone from the 1.5 branch? Please... --DD -Original Message- From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:03 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: PH2-provided import from proposal in 1.5 branch

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Knut Wannheden
Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is what import has to do with multiple inheritance :-) Because we can

RE: override

2003-08-07 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Some comments on the issues inside: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 4.43: - add possibility of prefix in import declaration import file=xxx prefix=xxy/ This would work as a qualified name ? I think basically yes, but

Re: PH2-provided import from proposal in 1.5 branch

2003-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are all the proposals gone from the 1.5 branch? I've removed the proposals from the 1.5 branch a while ago as they've been unmaintained (i.e. changes made in the main branch have not been ported to the 1.5 branch). What

RE: PH2-provided import from proposal in 1.5 branch

2003-08-07 Thread Dominique Devienne
I wanted to look again at proposals/embeb, which supported a version of import thru ProjectHelperImpl2.java, supposedly compatible with Ant 1.5.x. I'll need import sooner than 1.6 will be coming my way apparently, and need to investigate all my alternatives, from PH2 above, and the recently

Ant project status report

2003-08-07 Thread Conor MacNeill
Status Report for the Ant project o Ant 1.5.3-1 This was a supplementary release made on April 16th. There was no functional change. from Ant 1.5.3 - it just removed a copy of junit.jar which had inadvertently been included in the Ant 1.5.3 build. o Ant 1.5.4 This is scheduled for release

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Sorry if the mail becomes long, I have difficulty in deciding what to snip ;-) Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 15.56: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 07/08/2003 16.15: Some comments on the issues inside: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Well, IMHO I personally don't see a real, strong, compelling reason to have targets have crosstalk between themselves, but I do have an equally strong

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10016] - VAJ Tasks broken

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20457] - VAJRemoteUtil calls getAbsolutePath instead of getPath

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20457. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: override

2003-08-07 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I don't know _any_ programming language where import is used for inheritance. Believe it or not, XSLT is a programming language. :-) And it uses the term import for inheritance. Well, KISS is my concern as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22080] - VAJImport task fails with NullPointerException when using DirectoryScanner

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22080. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18667] - javah module no longer works with Java 1.4.2

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2236] - Visual Age vajload task - ability to load open projects in workspace

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/lib README xercesImpl.jar

2003-08-07 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/08/07 08:07:33 Modified:.Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH WHATSNEW lib Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH README xercesImpl.jar Log: This branch already contained a newer Xerces than 1.5.3 anyway - upgrade to 2.5.0 Revision ChangesPath No

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22220] New: - CVS task does not interoperate with cvsnt client

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: override

2003-08-07 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Knut Wannheden wrote, On 07/08/2003 16.13: ... Maybe it would be better to think in the term of mixin as some languages (e.g. some Lisp flavours and Ruby) use. The following two exerpts are from the Modules chapter of the free book Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmer's Guide

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] New: - telnet session skips read/write

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] New: - bogus condition results

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: csc and Mono (was Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml)

2003-08-07 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs. With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd vote for no refs. OK

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22227] New: - available task should support references IMO

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2236] - Visual Age vajload task - ability to load open projects in workspace

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] - bogus condition results

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] - bogus condition results

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21044] - ftp mkdir fails

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18240] - filesets in conjunction with FTP.

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18175] - Attempting to FTP causes ant to hang.

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18175. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

2003-08-07 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/08/07 15:20:34 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html Log: There have been several bug reports showing that users did not understand the meaning of remotedir and of the nested fileset(s) for the different actions of the ftp task. I have added a table to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19358] - Add timezone to FTP

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19358] - Add timezone to FTP

2003-08-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.