RE: javac-task and mapper

All you need to do is: No need for a mapper. Works like a charm ;-) --DD > -Original Message- > From: Ulf Caspers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: javac-task and mapper > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewi

Re: javac-task and mapper

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > or ? ! > What would the mapper in be supposed to do? There is a GlobPatternMapper in the javac-taskdef which is fixed to map *.java-files to corresponding *.class-files. This is the reason why the source directory structure and th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] - [PATCH] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22530] - Manifest task splits lines in classpath entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] - [PATCH] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] - [PATCH] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] - Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] New: - Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22530] - Manifest task splits lines in classpath entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22530] New: - Manifest task splits lines in classpath entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Task "exec" with attribute "output"

Morten Mortensen wrote: Hi all, I experience some funny stuff with the "exec" task, when I set the "output" attribute. It very much appears to me as if the output-stream does not get flushed. Tried 1.5.3 and some 1.6's. (I continue to have little luck with searching the bug-database; keep getting l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22528] New: - regular expressions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Task "exec" with attribute "output"

Hi all, I experience some funny stuff with the "exec" task, when I set the "output" attribute. It very much appears to me as if the output-stream does not get flushed. Tried 1.5.3 and some 1.6's. (I continue to have little luck with searching the bug-database; keep getting lists a numbers out -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22521] - java.endorsed.dirs sysproperty not passed to in-process java task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [OT] Build Time

Costin Manolache wrote: Nice work ! Regarding ant logging system - I think we should eventually reopen the subject and pick a logger API ( I preffer commons-logging, but I won't -1 any other choice ), then start using the normal if( log.isDebugEnabled()) log() that prevents useless string concat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - [PATCH] addition of access atribute to task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant Task

Hi, Andrei, 2 things about your post: 1. I think you need to give more details. It is not clear what your INIFile class does or why you want to use an ant task in place of a constructor call. 2. I think you need to ask this on the user list (see http://ant.apache.org/mail.html), not this list (

Re: Running ant in loop mode

On Saturday 16 August 2003 07:22 am, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I'm not an Ant committer, but a heavy Ant user, and I can say that I I'm in the same situation... > It's months that I wanted this but really never got round doing it, and Actually, I've been thinking about the patch for months t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22522] New: - -Task ignores dest-Attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22521] New: - java.endorsed.dirs sysproperty not passed to in-process java task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [OT] Build Time

Very clever indeed ;-) Thanks Stefan. --DD > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] Build Time > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Doe

Re: [OT] Build Time

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does that work with removing a listener as well? Should do. What the code does is to replace the listener list with a new one in add/remove. The fire method will grab the list and either work on the old list or on the new, but

RE: [OT] Build Time

Very clever! Does that work with removing a listener as well? I mean, what about the unlikely event that a listener decides to remove itself from a separate thread while an event is being fired from another thread, and thus the list of listener traversed? Assume the listener being removed as not be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22515] - [PATCH] Remove call to deprecated field and reflection to save properties into tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22515] New: - [PATCH] Remove call to deprecated field and reflection to save properties into tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant KEYS

antoine 2003/08/18 06:58:03 Modified:.KEYS Log: Added GnuPG key Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +30 -0 ant/KEYS Index: KEYS === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/KEYS,v retrieving revision 1.12

Re: I signed jakarta-ant-src.zip on archives.apache.org

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not know why I am getting the warning saying that the key is > not certified with a trusted signature. It says that the signature is a valid signature done by my key. This is the most important result. The "not certifie

Re: I signed jakarta-ant-src.zip on archives.apache.org

Hi Stefan, I have just downloaded gpg and ran the following steps : - generated keys for me, - imported keys of ant committers, gpg --import 'C:\dev\asf\ant\KEYS' gpg: key FEECAAED: public key "Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported gpg: key 51898504: public key "Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PR

Re: I signed jakarta-ant-src.zip on archives.apache.org

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IIRC, I did this to ensure it was compatible with some older > versions of PGP. Probably PGP 5.x as PGP 2.6.x doesn't support the algorithms used anyway. Thank you for the clarification Stefan --

Re: I signed jakarta-ant-src.zip on archives.apache.org

- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So I went ahead and signed the file and put the signature on > archive.apache.org. It would be nice if anybody using PGP and in > particular using PGP on Windows could verify the signature because of > this comment by Mages

Ant Task

Here is my problem: I have to write an Ant Task which must do the following: create an instance of an Class INIFile class from velocity and use that object in my project. Another description of the task may be:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22500] - chmod.fail property is not documented in installation instructions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

I signed jakarta-ant-src.zip on archives.apache.org

Hi, I checked out the ANT_12 tag from Ant's cvs and ran the srcdist target in it. After that I unzipped the created zip as well as the one I've downloaded from archive.apache.org and the only differences I could find were whitespace changes, all line-ends were different (Conor did the 1.2 release

cvs commit: ant ReleaseInstructions

bodewig 2003/08/18 03:30:49 Modified:.ReleaseInstructions Log: fix numbering Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +3 -3 ant/ReleaseInstructions Index: ReleaseInstructions === RCS file: /home/c

cvs commit: ant ReleaseInstructions

bodewig 2003/08/18 03:22:17 Modified:.ReleaseInstructions Log: revise Release Instructions Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +24 -15ant/ReleaseInstructions Index: ReleaseInstructions === RCS

cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

bodewig 2003/08/18 03:01:34 Modified:docs contributors.html xdocscontributors.xml Log: Add Tom's email address, fix typo Revision ChangesPath 1.27 +2 -2 ant/docs/contributors.html Index: contributors.html ===

cvs commit: ant/xdocs bindownload.xml srcdownload.xml

bodewig 2003/08/18 02:58:27 Modified:docs bindownload.html srcdownload.html xdocsbindownload.xml srcdownload.xml Log: Move old releases to archive.apache.org Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +1 -1 ant/docs/bindownload.html Index: bindownload

cvs commit: ant/xdocs index.xml

bodewig 2003/08/18 02:55:12 Modified:docs index.html xdocsindex.xml Log: One more place that mentions Ant's current version Revision ChangesPath 1.286 +1 -1 ant/docs/index.html Index: index.html ==

Re: error on ant.apache.org/

fixed, thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22500] New: - Build fails in targets dist-lite and internal_dist

Conor McNeill had written that we would like to introduce the tasks in ant (for 1.6) Where are we standing on this issue ? Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:03 AM Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22500] New: -

error on ant.apache.org/

The description of the link to the manual isn´t updated to 1.5.4: /xdocs/index.xml --- C:\seu\cvs-downloads\ant\ant\xdocs\index.xml.org.fixcrlfMon Aug 18 09:25:27 2003 +++ C:\seu\cvs-downloads\ant\ant\xdocs\index.xmlMon Aug 18 09:25:21 2003 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ -You can view th

Re: javac-task and mapper

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Ulf Caspers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My question is: Are there any concerns about a mapper element in a > java task? or ? What would the mapper in be supposed to do? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OT] Build Time

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DirectoryScanner.scandir Does somebody know anybody working on Ant logging system? Is Ant 1.6 better in this regard? Ant's DirectoryScanner may have become a lot (and I mean a lot) faster in 1.6, depe

Re: [OT] Build Time

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding ant logging system - I think we should eventually reopen > the subject and pick a logger API I fail to see the benefit of using a different logging system, but I'm ceratinly open to discuss it. Ant's system currently is

Re: [OT] Build Time

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> DirectoryScanner.scandir Does somebody know anybody working on Ant >> logging system? Is Ant 1.6 better in this regard? Ant's DirectoryScanner may have become a lot (and I mean a lot) faster in 1.6, depending on the patterns yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22500] New: - Build fails in targets dist-lite and internal_dist

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu