DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jesse Glick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, this kind of diff:
snip/
...is rather easier to read if you pass -b to cvs diff.
True, but then you'd miss if anybody committed tabs instead of spaces 8-)
In principle a semantically important change could be skipped
Maybe I'm nit-picking ...
On 29 Mar 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+protected void processLine(String line, int level) {
+if (line.startsWith(TESTLISTENER_PREFIX))
+task.log(line, Project.MSG_VERBOSE);
+else
+
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24798.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2005/03/30 00:35:44
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant IntrospectionHelper.java
ProjectHelper.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers
CompilerAdapterFactory.java
Kev Jackson wrote:
Well, a bit of hackery and you can verify that JAR is signed. But
there is *nothing* to verify that the signature itself is trusted.
Essentially jarsigner -verify is a worthless piece of junk from the
security perspective.
Who'd have thought that a commit message would
Hi,
I've removed write access from the ant-antidote module just to be sure
I really pick up the latest version.
Could you please have a look at
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antidote/ and comment on it (and
maybe check my signature 8-)? This is what I envision to become
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Here are my current plans
-pull the declaration of verifyjar, tests, etc.
-I'd leave the code over in optional, always excluded, with a here is
why this is broken comment. Its aim is to warn off others.
-Not attempt to use jar signing as a way of verifying JAR downloads in
libraries; this was my
Gump Integration Build wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community
bodewig 2005/03/30 01:45:29
Modified:docs cvs.html
docs/projects index.html
docs/projects/antidote design.html index.html module.html
news.html
xdocscvs.xml
xdocs/projects index.xml
yep - since a long long time ...
have heard on the gump list that 600+ project should be infected ... (if i
remember right)
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 30. März 2005 11:44
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gump Integration Build wrote:
Xalan?
Yes. Currently Gump is broken because the Xalan CVS module contains a
file with non-ASCII characters and the Python sync code we use chokes
on it.
The failures we see come from xml-api's
bodewig 2005/03/30 01:59:36
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets project.xml
Removed: docs/projects/antidote design.html index.html module.html
news.html
docs/projects/antidote/images screenshot.jpg
xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml
bodewig 2005/03/30 02:03:01
Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH bylaws.html cvs.html legal.html
license.html mail.html mission.html
docs/projects Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH index.html
xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH cvs.xml
bodewig 2005/03/30 02:08:18
Removed: docs/projects/antlib antlib_classloaders.html
antlib_contract.html antlib_descriptors.html
antlib_namespaces.html antlib_roadmap.html
index.html roles.html
Log:
Remove dead
bodewig 2005/03/30 02:09:00
Removed: docs/projects/antlib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
antlib_classloaders.html antlib_contract.html
antlib_descriptors.html antlib_namespaces.html
antlib_roadmap.html index.html roles.html
Kev Jackson wrote:
Here are my current plans
-pull the declaration of verifyjar, tests, etc.
-I'd leave the code over in optional, always excluded, with a here is
why this is broken comment. Its aim is to warn off others.
-Not attempt to use jar signing as a way of verifying JAR downloads in
no patch, Kev.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
noticed Stylebook was missing @param,
This task is so old, I wouldn't even know where to find stylebook ...
renamed m_foo - foo
Uhm, they are protected. I don't think anybody is extending the task,
but this is possible (actually, I
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said before, I saw the big patch on bugzilla and forgot about
this, but as the big patch is no longer valid (breaks bc), here's my
(very) minor version :)
Let's see how the revised version of the big patch works 8-)
Stefan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30606.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Update: I have been rolling this stuff around and I
am nearly ready to have something to show. In
general, and as the subject line suggests, I have
decided that implementing generic file collections as
resource collections may not be too difficult, and
could really open a lot of doors. Some
jglick 2005/03/30 08:56:19
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH javadoc.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Javadoc.java
Log:
Merge of #30606:
jglick 2005/03/30 08:59:26
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks javadoc.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java
Log:
Misc. cleanups relating to #30606.
Revision ChangesPath
1.799 +4 -4 ant/WHATSNEW
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30606.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jglick 2005/03/30 09:06:40
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit
JUnitTask.java
Log:
Fixed missing braces.
Revision ChangesPath
1.117 +5 -4
jglick 2005/03/30 09:08:27
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant BuildFileTest.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Watchdog.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit
JUnitTestRunner.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34244.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34244.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34244.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
38 matches
Mail list logo
