Hello List,
I have added a feature to Ant that I call Target Addressing, to help us
make releases of our open source project (greenstone). I want to know if
it's worth tidying up my changes and checking them back into Ant itself.
Having this feature has made my life a lot easier in developing
FWIW, Rob, I've been trying to catch somebody from ASF
infra on IRC to help with this, but have been
unsuccessful as yet. Sorry you're having so much
trouble.
-Matt
--- "Anderson, Rob (Global Trade)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still no response? I am have tried and tried again
> with no succe
Still no response? I am have tried and tried again with no success. Can
the list admin please help?
-Rob A
From: Anderson, Rob (Global Trade)
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:06 AM
To: 'Ant Users List'; 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: Still not able to
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008, Gilles Scokart a écrit :
> Up to now, I think Ivy has mostly be used in a single thread. When
> used from ant, even if it is possible to have multiple tasks running
> in parallel, I doubdt it has ever been extensively used.
>
> There is thus a risk that some part of the c
Up to now, I think Ivy has mostly be used in a single thread. When
used from ant, even if it is possible to have multiple tasks running
in parallel, I doubdt it has ever been extensively used.
There is thus a risk that some part of the code are not thread safe.
I'm wondering what is actually the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Author: hibou
> > > Date: Wed Jul 23 09:03:45 2008
> > > New Revision: 679119
> > >
> > > URL: http:/
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree,
>
> The goal is to have one single instance of HttpClient here to be able to
> reuse the connections.
> At the moment, the HttpClientHandler isn't a singleton, so the easiest way
> for me was to make it static.
>
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Nicolas Lalevée
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > The main problem IMO
> >
> >> is that it would then have the same release cycles, whilst the evolution
> >> needs may be very different.
> >
>
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: hibou
> > Date: Wed Jul 23 09:03:45 2008
> > New Revision: 679119
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=679119&view=rev
> > Log:
> > IVYDE-105 : Retrieve after resolve
I agree,
The goal is to have one single instance of HttpClient here to be able to reuse
the connections.
At the moment, the HttpClientHandler isn't a singleton, so the easiest way for
me was to make it static.
But maybe we can wait to see if the change solves the problem. If it doesn't,
we can
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: maartenc
> Date: Wed Jul 23 15:06:48 2008
> New Revision: 679208
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=679208&view=rev
> Log:
> Attempt to fix connection leak reported in IVY-854 by caching the
> HttpClient instance.
>
> Mo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: hibou
> Date: Wed Jul 23 09:03:45 2008
> New Revision: 679119
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=679119&view=rev
> Log:
> IVYDE-105 : Retrieve after resolve feature does not clean target directory
> first
> - added a but
12 matches
Mail list logo
