Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello Stefan, I have just done a svn checkout of the compress antlib. I have 2 first questions : - do we really want to run javac with the source and target options set to 1.2 ? I see that commons-compress itself requires at least 1.4. - what is the easiest way for lazy people [me for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

2010-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: I have just done a svn checkout of the compress antlib. Nice. I have 2 first questions : - do we really want to run javac with the source and target options set to 1.2 ? I see that commons-compress itself requires at least 1.4. No,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

2010-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: Adding a third question : in order to find out where commons-compress.jar should be put in the project, I have just tried to build the antlib from the command line. It looks like the expected way of building is to put

[POLL] update of ant's web site

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi, I have started a discussion about the update of the ant web site on the private list and would like to continue it on the public list. I am looking at ways to improve the generation of the ant web site and automate some tasks. One of the things what I found when preparing the release

Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)

2010-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: The other idea which we can pursue is to move to using svnpubsub for the web site. To do this we would need to have a special branch containing our web site. I've changed the subject to include Ivy as well since it would probably be a

[Fwd: Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0 artifacts to maven]

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi, as some of you have already noticed, the ant's 1.8.0 artifacts are not present yet on public maven repositories. forwarding message of Carlos Sanchez. I will see how I address these points. Regards, Antoine Original Message Subject:Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0

Re: [Fwd: Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0 artifacts to maven]

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
I did an upload by hand. I signed the jars and the pom files using the commons-openpgp ant task. Original Message Subject: Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0 artifacts to maven Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:30:43 -0800 From: Carlos Sanchez car...@apache.org Reply-To:

Re: [Fwd: Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0 artifacts to maven]

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Also, ReleaseInstructions and build.xml will need an update to conform to this m2 directory structure. Antoine Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I did an upload by hand. I signed the jars and the pom files using the commons-openpgp ant task.

Re: [Fwd: Re: upload of ant's 1.8.0 artifacts to maven]

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I did an upload by hand. I signed the jars and the pom files using the commons-openpgp ant task. Our files seem to be uploaded now this URL exists http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ant/ant/1.8.0/ I hope it works OK to actually use them now. Regards,

Re: svn commit: r908077 - in /ant/antlibs/compress/trunk: project-template.ivy.xml project-template.pom

2010-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Doing something similar for the compress-antlib tells me that my syntax seems to be fine and that Ant 1.8.0 is not available from the Maven repo (I know that you know). This is fixed now : Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ant/ant/1.8.0/ant-1.8.0.pom 789/? 2202/?

Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)

2010-02-11 Thread Martijn Kruithof
On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. Count this at least as a +0.5;-) It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function when we use a