2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I don't
want to enforce anything, just share the work I have done. It is still up to
debate and can still be reverted.
Well, process-wise we tend to discuss things out
On 2010-11-09, hi...@apache.org wrote:
Add a task to bind a target to an extension point.
Might be controversial. What is the use-case?
public void setTargets(String target) {
String[] inputs = target.split(,);
Wouldn't a nested element like ant's nested target be the better
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 13:39, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
On 2010-11-09, hi...@apache.org wrote:
Add a task to bind a target to an extension point.
Might be controversial. What is the use-case?
It is helping when some build files are shared between projects.
The use case is that I have some
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:14 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+ target name=binded
%s/binded/bound/g
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I
don't want to enforce anything, just share the work I have done. It is still
up to debate and can still be
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:35 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+msg.append( depends of: );
That doesn't sound correct somehow. depends on ? dependent of/on ?
Could native speakers chime in please? Thanks, --DD
I
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I
don't want to enforce anything, just share the work I have done. It is still
up to debate and can still be
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:35 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+ msg.append( depends of: );
That doesn't sound correct somehow. depends on ? dependent of/on ?
Could native speakers chime in please? Thanks, --DD
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 16:27, Matt Benson a écrit :
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I
don't want to enforce anything, just share the work I have
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 16:19, Dominique Devienne a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:14 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+ target name=binded
%s/binded/bound/g
argh, good catch.
thanks.
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 16:23, Matt Benson a écrit :
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:35 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+msg.append( depends of: );
That doesn't sound correct somehow. depends on ? dependent of/on ?
Could
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
That's what I thought, this proposed task being quite trivial and having no
side effect.
Obviously for larger patch or behavior change I would come first to the ML,
like I did for the project helpers for instance.
Fair enough. A follow
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 17:34, Dominique Devienne a écrit :
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
That's what I thought, this proposed task being quite trivial and having no
side effect.
Obviously for larger patch or behavior change I would come first to the ML,
like I did for
Le 9 nov. 2010 à 17:39, Dominique Devienne a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com
wrote:
The reason I'm a little reluctant on bindtargets is that it's a task
that affects the dependency graph of targets, but bypassing the normal
means to do that,
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
From the doc you just checked in, I now read:
+pThe bindtargets task may only be used as a top-level task. This means
that
+it may not be used in a target./p
So maybe I was wrong. I didn't see the code enforcing that though?
What
On 2010-11-09, Ludmila Shikhvarg wrote:
I've discovered some ant's problem during gump testing with jdk7
Thank you for reporting them. It might be a good idea to open bugzilla
issues for them.
1. The projects below failed to compile with jdk7 (1.7.0):
junit, test-junit
...
[javac] javac:
16 matches
Mail list logo
