Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

2008-09-22 Thread Petar Tahchiev
+1 2008/9/19, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I propose to adopt them as the AntUnit 1.1 release, please cast you > > votes, this vote will be open for a week. > > > +1. > > > -

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

2008-09-19 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose to adopt them as the AntUnit 1.1 release, please cast you > votes, this vote will be open for a week. +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

2008-09-19 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out > for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and > uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11

[VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

2008-09-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11/ I propose to adopt them as the AntUnit 1.1 release, please cast you votes, this vote will be

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The build went smooth, and it failed with Ant 1.6.5 It is supposed to (AntUnit requires 1.7.0+). > So here is my +1 (not-binding). Thanks Stefan - To uns

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi, I know my vote is not binding but still. I downloaded both the bin and the src archives. I found no problems with the archives, whatsoever. The build went smooth, and it failed with Ant 1.6.5 So here is my +1 (not-binding). Cheers, Petar. 2008/9/2, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > S

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The vote runs for a week and needs 3 PMC member +1s to pass (and more +1s than -1s). Six days and two PMC member votes later. I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the proposed beta

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi, > Six days and two PMC member votes later. > > I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the > proposed beta release. Sorry I haven't had chance to take a look yet :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The vote runs for a week and needs 3 PMC member +1s to pass (and >> more +1s than -1s). Six days and two PMC member votes later. I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the proposed beta release. Stefan --

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-27 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list > manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it > simply doesn't see the

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it simply doesn't see the signed part, only the signature), here is what I wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded distributi

[VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
pgpxlIZvtMBmz.pgp Description: PGP signature