Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-31 Thread Peter Reilly
+1: 6 +0: 1 -1: 0 no vote: 12 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 09:17 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn +1 Antoine --- Ursprüngliche Na

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/12/05, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which action from > >the bylaws > >to use. An "Adoption of New Codebase" needs 2/3 majority of committers which > >we havent (~ 1/3). > >Many committers h

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which > action from the bylaws to use. An "Adoption of New Codebase" needs > 2/3 majority of committers which we havent (~ 1/3). This is just an infrastructure change, no codeb

RE: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-16 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 August 2005 01:48 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn > > > +1 > Matt Benson wrote: > > Sorry I kept forgetting... > > > > Her

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-15 Thread Steve Cohen
-1: 0 no vote: 12 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 09:17 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn +1 Antoine --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Be

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-15 Thread Matt Benson
--- > +1: 5 > +0: 0 > -1: 0 > no vote: 8 > > Committer: 13+6=19 > - > +1: 6 > +0: 1 > -1: 0 > no vote: 12 > > > >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > >Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert

RE: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-12 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Committer: 13+6=19 > - > +1: 6 > +0: 1 > -1: 0 > no vote: 12 I thought I +1'd or at least +0'd, but maybe not. +1 one to SVN migration (do we have a choice ;-) +0 to migration any given

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-11 Thread Kev Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which action from the bylaws to use. An "Adoption of New Codebase" needs 2/3 majority of committers which we havent (~ 1/3). Many committers havent voted, but we have consensus. How to proceed? [snip resu

AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-11 Thread Jan.Materne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 09:17 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn > >+1 >Antoine >> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- >> Von: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> An: >> Betreff: [VOTE] migrate to svn >> Datum: Tue,

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-03 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
+1 Antoine > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: > Betreff: [VOTE] migrate to svn > Datum: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:40:46 +0200 > > Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really > vote on - IMO :-)

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Martijn Kruithof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really vote on - IMO :-) So I suggest: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." Great idea, +0 (not able to help currently)

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Kev Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really vote on - IMO :-) So I suggest: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. After passing the vote we

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Bruce Atherton
+1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. After passing the vote we should add a note on the homepage. --

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Stephane Bailliez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really vote on - IMO :-) So I suggest: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. After passing the vote we

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
+1 - Alexey. On 8/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really > vote on - IMO :-) > So I suggest: > > "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." > > That would be the first weekend after

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Conor MacNeill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really > vote on - IMO :-) > So I suggest: > > "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." > > That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. > After passin

Re: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really vote on - IMO :-) So I suggest: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. After passing the vote we

[VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-02 Thread Jan.Materne
Ok, I got some "+1", but "sooner" is not a timeframe you could really vote on - IMO :-) So I suggest: "Migrate Ant from CVS to SVN on the weekend of 13./14. August 2005." That would be the first weekend after the one-week voting timeframe. After passing the vote we should add a note on the ho