Thanks for adding the task Matt,
Antoine
Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for conducting the vote, Bruce. The task has been added.
-Matt
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I lost my email server for a few days, so I can only now close the
vote and post the results. I believe that
Thanks for conducting the vote, Bruce. The task has been added.
-Matt
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I lost my email server for a few days, so I can only now close the
vote and post the results. I believe that between my returned email
feed and the record of posts on Ma
I lost my email server for a few days, so I can only now close the vote
and post the results. I believe that between my returned email feed and
the record of posts on MarkMail[1] I have all the results. If you feel
your vote was missed, let me know.
On question 1, whether to adopt the augment
Martijn,
can change properties that are coded as attributes, but
only interacts with nested elements by adding new children to a given
reference. The task as it stands is extremely, extremely simple. Any
restrictions we care to impose would complicate it immensely--I would
again urge that we c
Hello
I have quite some difficulties with the discrepancy of the name of the
task and that what the task is about to do.
Therefore, using the current name and functionality I would cast a -0,5
vote, as i do not want to be blocking.
I can see the desire for a task that changes predeclared id's.
Same here
Dominique Devienne wrote:
1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to
be marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
+0
3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it
sho
> 1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
> 2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to
>be marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
+0
> 3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it
>should default to "false"?
+1
--DD
--
> So the questions are:
>
> 1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
> 2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to
> be marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
+0
> 3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it
> should default to "false"?
[repeating part of my vote since I didn't vote on the third question
last time]
On 2010-04-14, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> 1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
> 2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to be
> marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
-0
On 13/04/2010 3:34 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to be
marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
-0
3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it should
defaul
Ok, so this didn't start out as a vote thread, just my suggestion for
what questions should appear in the vote. But since it has morphed into
that I've changed the subject line to make it easier for people to find.
So the questions are:
1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
11 matches
Mail list logo
