jsch to apache mina for sshexec - Ant version 1.9.6 to 1.10.1

2019-01-11 Thread Sharat Chandran
Hello, We use ant internally in our build systems and heavily use sshexec/scp and ssh tasks. These rely on jsch which is an external library. Now that there is Apache Mina is there a way to move away from jsch to apache mina? Jsch project is not very active, so we were looking for an

Re: Include ANT_HOME location in "ant -version" ?

2018-04-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-04-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > In context of this[1] and many similar questions/confusion previously, > I am wondering if our "ant -version" output should even include, a > line in the output, the location which is used as ANT_HOME? I'd prefer -diagnostic

Re: Include ANT_HOME location in "ant -version" ?

2018-04-19 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
t;jai.forums2...@gmail.com>: > In context of this[1] and many similar questions/confusion previously, I > am wondering if our "ant -version" output should even include, a line in > the output, the location which is used as ANT_HOME? That will probably make > it clearer and easy

Include ANT_HOME location in "ant -version" ?

2018-04-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
In context of this[1] and many similar questions/confusion previously, I am wondering if our "ant -version" output should even include, a line in the output, the location which is used as ANT_HOME? That will probably make it clearer and easy to understand where it's being printed

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-10 Thread Andre-John mas
On 2013-12-10, at 0:18, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2013-12-09, Andre-John Mas wrote: It is what I used and how the patch was accepted, but since I was told it wasn't ideal I wanted to see if there were ways to deal with this going forward. It was me who said it wasn't

Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Andre-John Mas
Hi, I recently made a code contribution and had the task get the version from the Main class. I appreciate this probably want the best approach and I am trying to consider options going forward. I had looked at the ant.version property, but the is only available in the project scope and also

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Matt Benson
Are you looking for compatibility with the version? I.e., this task will work on versions = n? A commonly taken approach there is to use the presence of some particular class introduced in the target version, rather than fiddling with version numbers per se. HTH, Matt On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Andre-John Mas
Hi, This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in the user-agent response. I am using the value uninterpreted. André-John Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone. On Dec 9, 2013, at 14:23, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: Are you looking

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Matt Benson
Looks like Main.getAntVersion() is your friend. Matt On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andre-John Mas andrejohn@gmail.comwrote: Hi, This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in the user-agent response. I am using the value uninterpreted. André-John Sent

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Andre-John Mas
like Main.getAntVersion() is your friend. Matt On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andre-John Mas andrejohn@gmail.comwrote: Hi, This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in the user-agent response. I am using the value uninterpreted. André-John Sent

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Matt Benson
@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in the user-agent response. I am using the value uninterpreted. André-John Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone. On Dec 9, 2013, at 14:23, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Andre-John Mas
...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like Main.getAntVersion() is your friend. Matt On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andre-John Mas andrejohn@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in the user-agent response. I am using the value uninterpreted

Re: Ant Version

2013-12-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-12-09, Andre-John Mas wrote: It is what I used and how the patch was accepted, but since I was told it wasn't ideal I wanted to see if there were ways to deal with this going forward. It was me who said it wasn't ideal. My concern is IDE integration which might start Ant differently

Short version of the ant version string?

2013-11-22 Thread Andre-John Mas
Hi, As part of my work on issue 55489, Allow specifying of alternative user agent for the 'get' task, I need to be able to include the Ant version string in the user-agent (Apache Ant/0.0), but using the following: getProject().getProperty(MagicNames.ANT_VERSION) or Main.getVersion() both

Re: Short version of the ant version string?

2013-11-22 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
. Regards, Antoine On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: Hi, As part of my work on issue 55489, Allow specifying of alternative user agent for the 'get' task, I need to be able to include the Ant version string in the user-agent (Apache Ant/0.0), but using the following

Re: Short version of the ant version string?

2013-11-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-23, Andre-John Mas wrote: As part of my work on issue 55489, Allow specifying of alternative user agent for the 'get' task, I need to be able to include the Ant version string in the user-agent (Apache Ant/0.0), but using the following: getProject().getProperty

Ant Plugins - ant version compatibility

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Nellis
I am investigating how to determine whether an Ant plugin, built with Ant 1.8.1, will work with Ant 1.8.2. Is there a statement that indicates that this is supported, or is there a requirement that an Ant plugin must be compiled with 1.8.2 in order to work, and will then work with past

Re: Ant Plugins - ant version compatibility

2011-06-20 Thread Jesse Glick
On 06/20/2011 09:40 AM, Michael Nellis wrote: I am investigating how to determine whether an Ant plugin, built with Ant 1.8.1, will work with Ant 1.8.2. Do you mean an Ant task? Generally it should work this (not the reverse of course), though specific incompatibilities ought to be mentioned

Re: Ant Plugins - ant version compatibility

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Nellis
Jesse Glick jesse.glick at oracle.com writes: On 06/20/2011 09:40 AM, Michael Nellis wrote: I am investigating how to determine whether an Ant plugin, built with Ant 1.8.1, will work with Ant 1.8.2. Do you mean an Ant task? Generally it should work this (not the reverse of course),

Re: Ant Plugins - ant version compatibility

2011-06-20 Thread Matt Benson
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Michael Nellis mrnel...@us.ibm.com wrote: Jesse Glick jesse.glick at oracle.com writes: On 06/20/2011 09:40 AM, Michael Nellis wrote: I am investigating how to determine whether an Ant plugin, built with Ant 1.8.1, will work with Ant 1.8.2. Do you mean an

[PATCH] Expose just the Ant version String

2008-07-09 Thread Nick Pellow
+929,21 @@ private static String antVersion = null; /** + * The version string, as defined by the VERSION property in version.txt. + */ +private static String version = null; + +/** + * Returns just the ant version String. + * + * This will be generally of the form

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41654] New: - ant -version returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0

2007-02-19 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=41654 Summary: ant -version returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0 Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41654] - ant -version returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0

2007-02-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41654. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40959] New: - ant -version returns wrong version (1.6.5)

2006-11-13 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=40959 Summary: ant -version returns wrong version (1.6.5) Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0RC1 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40959] - ant -version returns wrong version (1.6.5)

2006-11-13 Thread bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 11:53 --- Tested and ant -version gives the correct result. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40959] - ant -version returns wrong version (1.6.5)

2006-11-13 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 11:53 --- Tested and ant -version gives the correct result

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24435] - Trailing space on Ant-Version key in MANIFEST

2003-11-21 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 Trailing space on Ant-Version key in MANIFEST [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24435] - Trailing space on Ant-Version ke y in MANIFEST

2003-11-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
-Original Message- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should be fixed in next ant 1.6 beta build And when would that be Peter? I could use a new beta myself... --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24435] - Trailing space on Ant-Version ke y in MANIFEST

2003-11-21 Thread peter reilly
The macrodef attribute issue(s) and local issue(s) need to be resolved first On Friday 21 November 2003 15:10, Dominique Devienne wrote: -Original Message- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should be fixed in next ant 1.6 beta build And when would that be

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24435] - Trailing space on Ant-Version ke y in MANIFEST

2003-11-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Friday 21 November 2003 15:10, Dominique Devienne wrote: -Original Message- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should be fixed in next ant 1.6 beta build And when would that be Peter? I could use a new beta myself... --DD From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24435] New: - Trailing space on Ant-Version key in MANIFEST

2003-11-05 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 Trailing space on Ant-Version key in MANIFEST Summary: Trailing space on Ant-Version key in MANIFEST Product: Ant Version: 1.5.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17684] New: - Ant version 1.5.1 jar with update option behaves diff from 1.4.1

2003-03-05 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=17684 Ant version 1.5.1 jar with update option behaves diff from 1.4.1 Summary: Ant version 1.5.1 jar with update option behaves diff from 1.4.1 Product: Ant Version: 1.5.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K